0 results for 'Rosenberg Estis'
Acceptance of Rent After Lease Termination: Does It Reinstate the Tenancy? It Depends
In their Landlord-Tenant Law column, Warren Estis and Michael Feinstein discuss the Second Department Appellate Term's decision in 'Scarborough Manor Owners Corp. v. Robson' and find the decision makes clear that the landlord's acceptance of rent for a period after the termination of the lease and prior to the commencement of a summary proceeding will not in all instances result in the reinstatement of the tenancy.NYLJ Recognizes Distinguished Leaders for 2017
The New York Law Journal announces the 2017 honorees for Distinguished Leadership, as part of its Professional Excellence Awards recognition event. The attorneys will be featured in a special section published on the Law Journal and honored at a dinner on Oct. 17 at Tribeca Rooftop.Landlords Win in Two First Department Cases
In their Rent Regulstion column, Warren Estis and Jeffrey Turkel discuss two recent decisions, "Matter of Park v. NYSDHCR," and "Dixon v. 105 West 75th Street," where the Appellate Division, First Department held, over rigorous tenant objections, that the apartments in question were exempt from rent stabilization.Tendering of Renewal Lease Vitiates the Right to Evict
In their Landlord-Tenant column, noting a split of authority, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss '757 Miller Owners v. Smith,' which held that the tendering of a renewal lease under Rent Stabilization Code vitiates a previously issued notice of termination.Commercial to Residential Substantial Rehabilitation
In their Rent Regulation column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel discuss the topic of "substantial rehabilitation" and look at whether units converted from commercial to residential use are exempt from "stabilization per se."Court Finds Powerful Remedy Against Defaulting Condo Owners
In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren Estis and Michael Feinstein discuss "Heywood Condominium v. Wozencraft," where the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the eviction of a condominium unit owner for non-payment of common charges.The 'Altman' Conundrum (Continued)
In their Rent Regulation column, Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel examine how the Appellate Division in 'Altman v. 285 W. Fourth, LLC' and the Appellate Term in 'Aimco 322 E. 61st Street v. Brosius' have arrived at differing interpretations of the same statutory deregulation threshold scheme.'Hamilton': Enforcement of Holdover Rent Provisions
In their Landlord-Tenant column, Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein discuss 'Hamilton 65th Partners, LLC v. Smallbone Inc.', which illustrates how a landlord's conduct may preclude enforcement of a holdover rent provision.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
The Benefits of Outsourcing Beneficial Ownership Information Filing
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Top 10 AI Use Cases in Private Equity
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now