0 results for 'Wright'
Repressed Memories Claimant Must Pay Almost $250K in Fees and Costs
Famous in research circles for allegedly having repressed memories of childhood abuse, Nicole Taus also might like to forget a trial court's decision earlier this week to stick her with more than $246,000 in attorney fees and costs. California's Solano County Superior Court ordered the big award for a University of Michigan psychiatry professor and four other defendants that Taus had sued for defamation for writing or printing articles debunking an earlier study about her psychiatric case.'Source Waivers' for Reporters Are Multiplying
A new type of waiver that has emerged out of the perjury trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby Jr. is gaining momentum as more reporters are subpoenaed to testify in court cases. "Source waivers" release reporters from a long-standing obligation to protect the identities of, and conversations with, their confidential sources of information. Supporters say the waivers provide protection for journalists facing jail. Opponents fear that source waivers are coerced unless a source personally approves them.Associates: Closing a Gender Generation Gap
Younger female associates are struggling to balance careers and families, but they are less likely than their male counterparts to be married or to be parents. Part of the problem, according to some of the new generation, is the example set by female partners, who are described as "barracudas" or "men in women's clothing."Lawyer Brings Lucrative Lemelson IP Streak to an End
Gerald Hosier has parlayed controversial inventor Jerome Lemelson's patents into more than $1 billion in licensing fees. Enter the Cooler -- Fish & Neave's Jesse Jenner. Representing a small group of manufacturers who couldn't afford to settle or lose, Jenner went after Lemelson's empire. In January, Lemelson's patents were ruled invalid, ending the most lucrative IP streak built on clever lawyering rather than scientific achievement.Media Cross Fingers as They Watch Indie Rockers' Smokin' Suit Against Rolling Stone
San Francisco's First District Court of Appeal considers whether Rolling Stone magazine can be sued by the subjects of an editorial feature upset by an adjacent Camel ad that, they say, could cause readers to think they endorsed smoking.Docket Watch: Reviewing the Cops' Media Relations
The long-standing symbiotic relationship between the police and the news media is under siege, and the U.S. Supreme Court is about to join in the attack. Two cases being argued Wednesday, Hanlon v. Berger and Wilson v. Layne, involve the hoary tradition of the "ride along," in which police allow the news media to accompany them on a raid or execution of a search warrant. The length of the oral argument -- hour and 20 minutes -- is only one of the procedural oddities here.Cite as: Costello v. City of Burlington, 08-0551-CV, NYLJ 1202482120529, at *1 (2Cir, Decided February 14, 2011)Before: Jacobs, Ch.J., Calabresi and Pooler, C.J
Daily Decision Alert: Vol. 10, No. 213 -- November 5, 2002
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
White Collar Investigation Practice: Global Expertise in Complex Investigations
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now
Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now