0 results for '*'
Phillips v. Insurance Commissioner
Where petitioners were involved in two automobile accidents within a 36-month period and where the amount the insurer had to pay exceeded $1,150, insurer did not violate Act 68 when it refused to renew petitioners' automobile insurance policy. Affirmed.Taking for Economic Development Purposes Upheld
The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London, takes on added significance in New Jersey, where the state's commitment to the smart growth initiative is designed to encourage redevelopment activities in the urban and older suburban areas.Net Income Drops At Clothing Company VF
Clothing company VF Corp. said its net income dropped 11 percent in the second quarter from results a year ago that included a large gain from the sale of the John Varvatos brand.View more book results for the query "*"
Alvarado v. J&J Snack Foods Corp.
Because the workers' compensation judge incorrectly construed and applied N.J.S.A. 34:15-64 in awarding fees to petitioner's attorney in this case involving competing dependency claims, the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of the principles enunciated here.Supreme Court review sought in public accounting board case
The federal appeals court opinion that upheld the constitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board was a disastrous decision that undermines the president's ability to supervise federal officers, say Jones Day lawyers who want the Supreme Court to review the case. The lawyers are urging the Court to review a split decision in which a D.C. Circuit judge wrote a 58-page dissent, calling the case the most important separation-of-powers litigation to reach the courts in more than 20 years.City of New York v. Group Health Inc.
City Denied Production of Cost, Profits Documents Sought in Challenge to Merger of Health InsurersSubpoenaing Its Own Client Earns Pepper Hamilton a Judge's Upbraiding
Size certainly matters, but it's not always an advantage, as 400-lawyer Pepper Hamilton learned the hard way. The firm's Philadelphia office subpoenaed as a witness a longtime client of its Detroit branch, only to see a Pepper Hamilton lawyer from Detroit show up with a motion to quash. "Serving a subpoena on an existing firm client is, to say the least, a professional embarrassment to be avoided at all costs," wrote U.S. District Judge Stephen Orlofsky.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Aligning Client Needs with Lawyer Growth and Profitability
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now
Technology to Make E-Discovery Smarter, Not Harder
Brought to you by Nuix
Download Now
Does Generative AI Have the Power to Transform Legal Services?
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
How This Personal Injury Firm Reduced Client Intake Time by 80%
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now