0 results for 'Mobil'
High Court Limits Reach of Tort Law
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday sharply limited the reach of a federal law used to hold corporations and others accountable for human rights abuses committed abroad. But human rights lawyers predicted additional litigation over how much of the federal courthouse door was left ajar.Law Firm Scores $249 Million Payday in ExxonMobil Class Action
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson scored a dream payday Thursday when a federal judge awarded the Miami-based law firm $249 million in fees for its successful representation of gas station owners in a $1.1 billion class action case against ExxonMobil. Judge Alan S. Gold's ruling ends a ferocious battle among various attorneys and constitutes one of the largest fee awards on record. Gold awarded Stearns Weaver 75 percent of the total fees; four other firms will split the remainder.Forum Non Conveniens: 2nd Circuit Invigorates Applicable Principles
In three recent decisions, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed dismissals by district court judges based on the doctrine of forum non conveniens and has affirmed and re-energized several long standing principles of law in this area. These decisions raise questions about the scope of a district court's discretion in addressing forum non conveniens issues.High Court to Hear Alien Tort Claims Act Arguments
Feeling the sting of international human rights litigation, the business community and the Bush administration will try to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court this week to eliminate tort liability under a 215-year-old statute. Carter G. Phillips of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, high court counsel in Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, says federal appeals courts -- including the 9th Circuit, from which Sosa comes -- "have launched a misguided legal revolution."Senate Snoops Around Risky Tax Positions
Accounting disclosures could provide a 'road map' to how blue-chip companies seek to shield income.White-Collar Defendants Find Benefits in Supreme Court's Sentencing Decisions
When the Supreme Court declared in United States v. Booker that the mandatory application of the federal sentencing guidelines was unconstitutional, many white-collar criminal defense attorneys hoped that judges would free themselves of the shackles of the rigid formulas employed by the guidelines.Supreme Court Settles Supplemental Jurisdiction Debate
Supreme Court held the claim of one plaintiff meeting the minimum amount in controversy requirement was sufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction for joined palintiffs.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The Role of Evolving Support Structures in Optimizing Legal Talent
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now
Corporate Monitorship Advisory Services
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
AI-Powered Deposition and Medical Record Summaries: Low Risk, High Reward
Brought to you by Parrot
Download Now
Aligning Client Needs with Lawyer Growth and Profitability
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now