0 results for 'Mobil'
Griggs v. Bounce N' Around Inflatables, L.L.C.
The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled that a minor who was illegally hired and who was injured while engaging in a task prohibited by the state’s child labor law was subject to the exclusive remedy provisions of Louisiana’s workers’ compensation law.District Court Refuses to Vacate Sanctions Awards Following Settlement
In his Settlements and Compromise column, Thomas E.L. Dewey discusses a recent decision from the Southern District of New York, which reminds us that the parties are not the only ones who have a say in what can be resolved in a settlement agreement. Courts have an interest in preserving their authority to enforce orders and procedural rules, and parties cannot avoid the consequences of noncompliance through private settlement.A Dose of Reality for the NYC Asbestos Litigation
The opinions in 'Juni' present a sea change in the presentation of evidence on the issue of causation in New York asbestos cases. Plaintiffs will need to evaluate their proof on this issue to ensure that it meets the requirements of 'Parker' and 'Cornell'.Fernelius Simon Adds Partner, Lengthens Name to Include All Lawyers
"I do think it's helpful to be a name partner in a firm," firm founder Stephen Fernelius said.Head of NY AG Economic Justice Division to Depart for Quinn Emanuel
“I hope to expand the plaintiff-side state AG practice, so basically pitching state AGs across the country because New York doesn't hire too many outside counsel for their investigations,” Sheth said.Timing Is Key in Copyright Case | Gorsuch-Sotomayor Team Up (Again) | More on 'Serial Adversaries'
Our snapshot on the lawyers arguing today's big copyright case at the US Supreme Court, plus: observations on the Gorsuch-Sotomayor alignment in a Sixth Amendment dispute, and more on "serial adversaries" at the high court. Thanks for reading Supreme Court Brief!Requiem for the Biomechanical 'Frye' Hearing?
On Dec. 5, 2018, a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, Second Department issued its decision in 'Shah v. Mo. M. Rahman', upholding the trial court's ruling not to grant plaintiff's counsel's application to hold a 'Frye' hearing before admitting into evidence the testimony of a defense biomechanical engineering expert. In so doing, the court, citing, well established Court of Appeals authority, has arguably dealt the biomechanical 'Frye' hearing its final death blow.A Review of 'New York City Asbestos Litigation, Juni v. Ford'
In their New York Court of Appeals Roundup, William T. Russell Jr. and Lynn K. Neuner discuss a recent significant ruling on expert proof in the asbestos arena, in which the Court of Appeals held that the plaintiff in a mesothelioma case had not provided sufficient evidence of causation and affirming the vacatur of an $11 million jury award.Mahanna, NY AG Chief of Staff, Set to Join Wilmer as Partner
Brian Mahanna, who also once served as senior adviser to former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, will be a member of the firm's Regulatory and Government Affairs Department, where he will help clients manage high-profile crises and other challenges involving regulators.Second Circuit Rules 'Rooker-Feldman' Doesn't Bar Suit Against NYC's No-Fault Nuisance Evictions
The plaintiffs' arguments focused on injuries caused by settlement agreements with the city, not with later court ratification of those agreements, the panel found.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The Role of Evolving Support Structures in Optimizing Legal Talent
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now
Corporate Monitorship Advisory Services
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
AI-Powered Deposition and Medical Record Summaries: Low Risk, High Reward
Brought to you by Parrot
Download Now
Aligning Client Needs with Lawyer Growth and Profitability
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now