0 results for 'University of Pittsburgh'
Pa. Law Weekly - People in the News - July 20, 2010
Click the headline above to view this week's People in the News Listings.Third Party in Elevator Accident Case May Invoke Attorney-Client Privilege
Otis Elevator Co.'s communications with its distributor in Aruba, Caribbean Elevator, can remain confidential, a federal judge has ruled, because attorney-client privilege attaches to the third party.Cisco lawsuit against Apple over iPhone naming rights could get ugly
SAN FRANCISCO AP - What's a name worthTo find out, Cisco Systems Inc. and Apple Inc. may spend millions of dollars in a high-stakes legal battle - and the winner could walk away with the rights to the coveted name "iPhone."In a lawsuit filed Wednesday, Cisco asked a judge to forbid Apple from using the name "iPhone," a Cisco trademark since 2000.View more book results for the query "University of Pittsburgh"
Denying an Injury Claim Due to a Positive Drug Test
Imagine the following hypothetical: It is 10 a.m. and an employee limps into his supervisor`s office, bleeding profusely from his hand. The employee informs the supervisor that he accidentally caught his hand in a dangerous piece of machinery at his workstation. The employee is immediately sent to the emergency room, where he receives 15 stitches and is informed that the laceration caused severe nerve damage to his hand. Additionally, per company policy, the employee submits to a post-accident drug screen.Understanding Dramatically Different IP Laws in Asian Countries
For decades, the first foray abroad for most American businesses was Europe, where intellectual property laws and IP protection rights closely parallel the U.S. system. What's more, in Europe, a company can invest in multiple countries and yet usually confront only one set of IP concerns. In short, U.S. and European IP laws are consistent and continue to evolve in meeting the needs of businesses and the challenges of new technologies.What's Next for Samuel Kent in Wake of Guilty Plea?
In September 2008, U.S. District Judge Samuel B. Kent of the Southern District of Texas spoke loudly and forcefully when entering a not guilty plea to sex abuse charges. But last week in a Houston courtroom his tone was markedly different as a clearly beaten Kent whispered "guilty" to an obstruction-of-justice charge. Kent's decision to plead guilty to the obstruction charge will cost him any chance at a standard judicial retirement salary and most likely his bar card and freedom, five experts say.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
The Benefits of Outsourcing Beneficial Ownership Information Filing
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Top 10 AI Use Cases in Private Equity
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now