0 results for 'State Farm Insurance'
Cinemark Holdings, Inc. v. Factory Mut. Ins. Co.
The plaintiffs sought leave to amend their complaint, but the insurer argued that an amendment would be both futile and unduly prejudicial.
Cannabis' Plummeting Price-Per-Pound and the Rise of Delta-8 THC
Although forming America's sixth-largest crop yielding 48.8 million pounds of flower and $27 billion in legal sales annually, marijuana's plunging price-per-pound and the availability of cheaper, unregulated hemp-derived tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) products is thwarting the cannabis industry.
Motorist Injured in Rear-End Accident Paid $760,000 to Resolve Bergen County Suit
A woman who sustained head and spine injuries when her vehicle was rear-ended received a $760,000 settlement in her Bergen County suit, Flanders v.…
'Geist v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance': Third Circuit Gets Into the Act
After settling a tort claim against the driver and discovering that the driver's insurance coverage could not fully compensate her for her injuries, she sought to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under a personal automobile insurance policy issued to her parents, Kevin and Karen Iwasaki (the policy).
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Texas Personal Automobile Insurance Policy 2020
Authors: Janet K. Colaneri
View this Book
View more book results for the query "State Farm Insurance"
Final Four: Who Will Become Atlanta's Newest Judge?
Meet the judicial candidates in the running to become Atlanta's newest superior court judge and learn why each thinks they're the best fit.
Woman Sues State Farm Over Disputed Personal Property Theft Claim
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
Pa. Justices Eye Whether Deleting Vehicle From Insurance Counts as 'Purchase' in UIM Stacking
"In order to hold in the manner in which you're arguing we would have to read 'purchase' to mean any change in coverage," said Justice Christine Donohue, who sits on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court bench.Galarza v. Direct Auto Ins. Co.
Both cases in this appeal were based on policy language that excluded UM coverage for pedestrians struck by a hit-and-run vehicle because a pedestrian, by definition, cannot occupy a covered vehicle.
Common Sense Isn't Dead in Statutory Construction, Even When Statute Is Unambiguous
Fourth Circuit predicts how North Carolina Supreme Court would interpret notice requirement in insurance statute, emphasizing legislative purpose.Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 2A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
- 3Data-Driven Legal Strategies
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Elder Litigators Confront Tough Questions in Last Act of Careers
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
The Benefits of Outsourcing Beneficial Ownership Information Filing
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Top 10 AI Use Cases in Private Equity
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now