0 results for 'Stark Stark'
Contrite Lerach gets maximum two-year term
The gray-haired man in the black robe huffed. And he puffed.But in the end, Los Angeles federal Judge John Walter didn't blow up William Lerach's plea deal. Walter did, however, sentence the former securities class action king Monday to two years in jail the highest penalty allowed under Lerach's agreement with the government.Clinic That Revealed Confidential Data Is Found Subject to Punitive Damages
Nothing's Automatic: Toyota and Ford Headed in Different Directions
News Analysis: The legal controversy swirling around Toyota has opened a window onto the Japanese automaker's culture and management style, and has created an occasion to compare Toyota's approach to that of Ford.Court allows lawyers seeking sanctions to recover costs
A sharply worded opinion by 11th U.S. Circuit Judge Ed Carnes upheld $387,738 in sanctions against Fort Lauderdale lawyers Bill and Karen Amlong.Amid alarm bells, blood substitute keeps pumping
By Thomas M. Burton, The Wall Street Journalvia AP - Several years ago a clinical trial of a blood substitute called PolyHeme finished with worrisome results. Ten of 81 patients who received the fake blood suffered a heart attack within seven days, and two of those died. None of the 71 patients in the trial who received real blood were found to have had a heart attack.Analyzing the SEC's First Deferred Prosecution Agreement
Nader H. Salehi and Herbert F. JanickIII, partners at Bingham McCutchen, and Todd M. Beaton Jr., an associate at the firm, write that on May 17, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with Tenaris, S.A., by which the SEC, in exchange for Tenaris' continued cooperation in the investigation by the Division of Enforcement, agreed to refrain for a period of two years from bringing an enforcement action against Tenaris for alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.'Equal Opportunity Harasser' Suit Settles
An 11th-hour settlement has canceled the trial of a novel same-sex sexual harassment suit in which the defense intended to argue the "equal opportunity harasser" defense since the offending employee allegedly harassed both men and women. Nevertheless, Pennsylvania federal judge John Padova handed down several important rulings in the case just before the trial was to start. Perhaps most significant was his decision to let the plaintiff go forward with a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now
Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now