NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Venable'

You can use to get even better search results
November 13, 2006 | Law.com

The NLJ 250 Chart (101-150)

7 minute read
June 12, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

General Assignment Order, 2007-08

Notice to the bar.
14 minute read
Michael Hausfeld of Hausfeld
Publication Date: 2008-11-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

January 24, 2000 | Law.com

Test for 'Inherent Distinctiveness' of Trade Dress Debated in Supreme Court

It began as the case of a clothing manufacturer struggling to protect the designs of its products against knock-offs commissioned by a retail behemoth. But when the feud between Wal-Mart and Samara Brothers reached the U.S. Supreme Court, it was clear the case had touched off a debate on one of the most fundamental questions in trade dress law: When is a product configuration that has not been copyrighted, trademarked, or patented so "inherently distinctive" that it deserves protection from infringement?
9 minute read
April 23, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

2009 Judicial Survey — Vicinage 6 — Hudson

Survey results for Vicinage 6, Hudson County
25 minute read
November 05, 2012 | The American Lawyer

Big Deals

Morgan Stanley/Citigroup; M&T/Hudson City; Realty Income/American Realty Capital
8 minute read
July 01, 2011 | Corporate Counsel

The 2011 Diversity Scorecard

This year's Diversity Scorecard shows that minorities are slowly winning back previous gains.
41 minute read
Ruling Could Spell Trouble for REIT M&A Challenges
Publication Date: 2013-08-20
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

In what defense lawyers are calling a landmark opinion, a Maryland judge threw out a shareholder class action over a $721 million merger between two real estate investment trusts, ruling that deal protection mechanisms long accepted by judges in Delaware are also kosher under Maryland law.

Lockheed Seeking Nearly $700 Million in Trial Against L-3 Communications
Publication Date: 2009-05-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A big, big trade secrets trial is set to begin in Atlanta federal court this week, reports the Fulton County Daily Report. Lockheed Martin is seeking $689 million in compensatory and punitive damages from L-3 Communications for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to Lockheed's line of marine patrol, antisubmarine aircraft.

June 26, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

New Jersey Courts General Assignment Order

Notice to the bar.
13 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Driving Value with Better Decision-Making: A Governance Maturity Checklist

    Brought to you by Diligent Corporation

    Download Now

  • Strategic Triumph: Unveiling the Secrets Behind Small Law Firms Thriving with AI Research and Drafting

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now