Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Fish Richardson'

You can use to get even better search results
November 13, 2008 |

Newsbriefs

4 minute read
Supreme Court Nixes Bid to Contest Mega-Award in Bard Vascular Graft Case
Publication Date: 2013-01-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

After decades of legal battles, C.R. Bard is finally poised to collect a huge chunk of change from rival W.L. Gore & Associates in their patent fight over artificial blood vessels.

Baxter Loss at Federal Circuit Draws Sharp Dissent over PTO Authority
Publication Date: 2012-05-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Judge Pauline Newman tore into her Federal Circuit colleagues Thursday for affirming a PTO determination that a patent was invalid, accusing the two-judge majority of ignoring the appellate court's prior decision that the very same patent passed muster.

November 05, 2004 |

The Firm Reports: From A to F

105 minute read
NPE Acacia on a Roll with New Settlements and New Polaroid Patents
Publication Date: 2012-05-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Acacia Research Corporation, which reported a record $99 million in revenues in the first quarter of 2012, has been racking up settlements in its wide-ranging patent infringement litigation campaign. And the company just picked up new collection of digital imagining patents once held by Polaroid.

January 31, 2006 |

Biggest Losses

8 minute read
Samirah & Enung v. Sabhnani, 08-cv-2970 (ADS)(WDW)
Publication Date: 2011-03-29
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samirah and Enung: By: Karen Yeh, Esq., of Counsel, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, N.Y. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samirah and Enung: By: Ivy O. Suriyopas, Esq., of Counsel, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, New York, N.Y.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendants Varsha Sabhnani and Mahender Sabhnani: Sam P. Israel, Esq., New York, N.Y.
Case number: 08-cv-2970 (ADS)(WDW)

Cite as: Samirah & Enung v. Sabhnani, 08-cv-2970, NYLJ 1202488301345, at *1 (EDNY, Decided March 25, 2011)District Judge Arthur D. Spattp class="decide

Bill Lee's Big Week
Publication Date: 2010-04-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The Wilmer partner has already won three big rulings this week from the Federal Circuit--and it's only Wednesday.

June 06, 2005 |

Battle of the Clones

When Geron Corp. needed to knock out another company's cloning patent, it relied on a little used, poorly understood but frequently effective procedure known as an interference hearing. For the handful of lawyers who do them, interferences have been extremely good business. Yet it may be endangered work, threatened by new rules, patent reform proposals, increasing complexity and cost, and the decreasing willingness of the PTO to hear them.
15 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

NEXT