0 results for 'undefined'
Judicial Ethics Opinion 23-218
(1) A judge who presides in estate proceedings may continue to serve on the board of directors of a not-for-profit hospice organization, even after the judge becomes aware that a testator named the hospice as a beneficiary in their will. (2) The judge may preside over the probate of a will that contains a bequest to the hospice, absent a challenge to the bequest. If a challenge occurs, the judge must disqualify.California AI Bills Survive Legislative Hurdle, But Narrowed
Bills regulating AI training and safety will move to legislative floor votes after committee amendments.Kamala Harris Would Only Be the Second Lawyer-President With a Non-T-14 Law Degree
UC Law SF Dean David Faigman said legal education is "a hallmark of American presidents," noting that 27 of the nation's 45 past presidents were previously lawyers.Kamala Harris Would Be Only the Second Lawyer-President With a Non-T-14 Law Degree
UC Law SF Dean David Faigman said legal education is "a hallmark of American presidents," noting that 27 of the nation's 45 past presidents were previously lawyers.View more book results for the query "*"
$2.6M FTC Settlement With Auto Dealer Accused of Racial Bias Reveals Rift Among Commissioners
"By seeking to ... transform the agency into a general civil rights regulator, the commission risks further politicizing the agency's mission," GOP Commissioner Melissa Holyoak wrote.Federal Judge Sanctions Pittsburgh Firm for 'Campaign of Deception' in Debt Collection Disputes
"Counsel are well advised to heed one lesson from this experience in particular, among the many," Bissoon wrote. "This court is immune from gaslighting. It will not work, and attempts will be met with great disfavor."Nasdaq Sues Singaporean Company for Reselling Its Financial Feeds
Nasdaq's complaint accuses an unnamed company of misappropriating the financial services company's data and undermining its business by selling the stock feeds at a discountCovington Defeats Jones Day: AstraZeneca Escapes $107.5M Verdict
AstraZeneca prevailed on its argument that patents-in-suit are invalid because they are not enabled on the issue of unit dosage.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Driving Value with Better Decision-Making: A Governance Maturity Checklist
Brought to you by Diligent Corporation
Download Now
Strategic Triumph: Unveiling the Secrets Behind Small Law Firms Thriving with AI Research and Drafting
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now