NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
April 19, 2005 | Law.com

High Court Agrees to Sit Down to Religious Tea Case

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider a Bush administration plea to keep members of a New Mexico church from using a hallucinogenic tea in their ceremonies. The administration wants the high court to overturn a November 2004 en banc ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The en banc decision affirmed an earlier injunction that prohibited the government from barring importation and use of the tea, which contains a substance barred under the federal Controlled Substances Act.
3 minute read
February 22, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

Supreme Court hears immigrant's ID theft case

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Ignacio Carlos Flores-Figueroa, an undocumented worker from Mexico, made a curious and undeniably bad decision.
3 minute read
October 03, 2012 | New York Law Journal

Real Estate Workouts - Excess Nonrecourse Partnership Debt

In his Real Estate Securities column, Peter M. Fass, a partner at Proskauer Rose, continues a discussion of the tax consequences of restructuring a troubled loan secured by real estate, where the owner is a partnership, with a review of a recent IRS revenue ruling which addresses guidance on cancellation of indebtedness income in the partnership context.
11 minute read
November 08, 2012 | Legaltech News

Quicklaw for Office Combines Internet, Legal Research and Microsoft Office

LexisNexis Canada, a provider of content, software, and workflow tools for Canadian legal professionals, launched Quicklaw for Microsoft Office on Thursday, which integrates Office tools, online legal research and the Internet.
2 minute read
April 04, 2007 | New York Law Journal

Fulani v. MacKay

Voting Rights Act Pre-Clearance Requirement Not Breached By Party's Removal of Plaintiffs From County Posts
1 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

September 11, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

Justices to Mull Statute of Limitations in Med Mal Cases

The state Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on whether, in light of the certificate of merit requirement, the statute of limitations in a medical malpractice case where there are multiple potential causes of an injury should toll upon confirmation of the specific cause of the injury or simply upon discovery that the injury was the result of someone else's conduct.
7 minute read
September 30, 2005 | Law.com

Heirs in $165M Suit Say Coke Ties Compromise SunTrust Banks

SunTrust Banks Inc.'s failure to diversify family trust assets that sometimes had up to 90 percent Coca-Cola stock has prompted claims against the bank. The $165 million federal suit raises questions about the bank's decades-old relationship with Coke and also will likely test the limits of attorney-client privilege between King & Spalding and its longtime clients Coke and SunTrust. The bank has identified two King & Spalding partners in the firm's trusts practice as witnesses in the case.
12 minute read
October 10, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

In re Pendleton

The Supreme Court's holding in Miller v. Alabama that mandatory life without parole for those under the age of 18 violates the Eighth Amendment is retroactive to cases on collateral review.
4 minute read
March 28, 2008 | Daily Report Online

College gossip Web site targeted by New Jersey attorney general denies breaking law

TRENTON, N.J. AP - The college gossip Web site JuicyCampus.com has criticized a consumer fraud investigation launched by the New Jersey attorney general."JuicyCampus has not violated any laws," reads an unsigned statement posted on the Web site earlier this week. The statement also accuses the attorney general of interfering with users' free speech.
2 minute read
September 24, 2009 | Law.com

3rd Circuit Says Corporations May Take Info Requests 'Personally'

Lawyers for AT&T have won a court battle with the Federal Communications Commission over whether corporations are entitled to assert claims of "personal" privacy. The FCC argued that when Congress crafted the exemptions clauses of the Freedom of Information Act, it intended the phrase "personal privacy" to extend only to human beings. But AT&T claimed that FOIA specifically defines the term "person" to include corporations. The 3rd Circuit has ruled that AT&T had the better argument.
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now

  • Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now