0 results for 'undefined'
National Enquirer settles with Britney Spears by apologizing
DUBLIN, Ireland AP - The National Enquirer apologized to Britney Spears in its British edition Tuesday for reporting that she was ready to divorce Kevin Federline.The articles were published June 5 and June 12 under the headlines, "Britney marriage is over" and "Britney and Kevin: And now their divorce" Both stories were vaguely sourced to unidentified friends of the couple.Ceglia Moves to Oust Gibson Dunn From Facebook Ownership Case as Defense Seeks Smoking Gun
No Personal Interest Found to Enforce Terms of Bequest to Hospital
Henderson v. Keisling, PICS Case No. 10-1122 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2010) Kelly, S. J. (6 pages).
Henderson v. Keisling, PICS Case No. 10-1122 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2010) Kelly, S. J. (6 pages).Once Seen As Wild, June Could Be a Tame Month For Legislature
On the surface, the General Assembly is facing a legislative agenda next month that will be . well, less pleasant than a June walk in the park. A proposal to allow slot machines at the horse racing tracks, medical malpractice measures, education funding, and tax increases all await lawmakers when they return to Harrisburg on June 2. Nonetheless, June could end up being surprisingly low key, say some long-time Harrisburg observers.View more book results for the query "*"
Fired stockbroker prevails in Morgan Keegan arbitration
John Quaranta and Marguerite Snyder, along with Ronald Weil, helped their client win a defamation award after he was fired and accused of making unauthorized stock trades.Failure to Swear in Witness Results in Dismissal of Case
The violation of an "elemental" rule - that a grand jury witness must swear to tell the truth before testifying - has persuaded an appellate court to adopt the "exceptional" remedy of dismissing charges filed in 1996 after a man allegedly shot an elderly woman three times in the chest and partially strangled her 4-year-old granddaughter.Justices Seem Receptive to First Amendment Challenge to Anti-Terror Law
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared troubled on Tuesday by the broad sweep of a federal law that makes it a crime to give "material support" and "expert advice" to designated terrorist groups. The law was challenged as a vague or overbroad violation of First Amendment rights. But what seemed to bother the justices most was the assertion by U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan that the law would bar a lawyer from writing an amicus curiae brief on behalf of such a group in U.S. courts.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now
Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now