NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for '*'

You can use to get even better search results
October 13, 2000 | Law.com

Domain Dilemma

The nearly year-old arbitration system to resolve conflicts between domain name holders and trademark owners established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has been -- by most accounts -- a success. But there are a few glitches. Some lawyers worry about copyright law being undermined, inconsistent decisions, and the fact there are no set guidelines to follow in a dispute.
1 minute read
January 24, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

News In Brief

The catchall six-year statute of limitations to filing civil actions in Pennsylvania applies to Act 534 claims for injuries sustained by employees of state mental hospitals, the Commonwealth Court has ruled in a case of first impression.
10 minute read
November 13, 2007 | National Law Journal

Taxes Are Not Necessarily a Certain Thing

Many law firms have offices in multiple states and also work for clients in states in which they don't have offices. The tax ramifications of doing business in more than one state are complex and uncertain, possibly leading to a higher tax liability and higher costs of complying with many different tax laws and regulations. Beers & Cutler attorney Bill Apple explains what law firms can do to comply with the tax rule requirements of various states.
7 minute read
October 18, 2007 | Daily Report Online

Judge fines lawyers suing Chevron over Ecuador operations

SAN FRANCISCO AP - A federal judge has sharply rebuked lawyers suing Chevron Corp. for allegedly causing cancer after polluting areas of Ecuador and ordered the lead attorney to pay a $45,000 fine after wrongly claiming that some of the purported victims were sick.The judge also found that the three purported victims didn't even know that the lawyers were filing a federal lawsuit here in their names.
2 minute read
October 11, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Beneficial Mut. Saving Bank v. Gelt Financial Corp., PICS Case No. 11-4165 (C.P. Philadelphia Sept. 12, 2011) Panepinto, J. (7 pages).

The court refused to open a confessed judgment where the subject loan documents and subsequent modification were clear on their face that a default would occur if defendants did not pay the entire loan debt off by a particular modified maturity date. Affirmance recommended.
3 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book New Jersey Business Litigation 2025 Authors: Paul A. Rowe, Andrea J. Sullivan View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

May 24, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

Kurian v. Anisman

The trial court properly refused to accept plaintiffs' expert report on the grounds of unfair surprise and prejudice to defendants, where plaintiffs first submitted the report in response to defendants' summary judgment motion. Affirmed.
1 minute read
February 20, 2006 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Firms Put Private Investigators On The Payroll

In a perfect world, firms could employ private investigators who are as skilled as pseudo-bumbling television police detective Columbo.
4 minute read
July 19, 2004 | Texas Lawyer

Effort to Add Amendments Misuses Time and Taxpayer Money

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn has been out and about vigorously advocating various amendments to the U.S. Constitution in what is an exercise in disingenuous polemics, with a flawed rendition of American constitutional history.
5 minute read
July 26, 2013 | New York Law Journal

'Myriad' Aftermath: What Remains Patent Eligible?

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft partner Dorothy R. Auth writes: The Supreme Court's recent holding sent shock waves throughout the biotech IP community not only because the court invalidated a class of commonly issued patent claims, but also because it established a bright-line distinction between naturally and non-naturally occurring compounds. However, a calmer reading of 'Myriad' reveals that its reach may be more limited than first reported.
7 minute read
July 24, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

Commonwealth v. In re D.S.

Because the juvenile was actually 15 years old when he allegedly committed robbery and aggravated assault with a handgun, the Juvenile Court should have granted the commonwealth's petition to transfer the matter, on jurisdictional grounds, to the criminal court division. Vacated and remanded.
1 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Aligning Client Needs with Lawyer Growth and Profitability

    Brought to you by BigHand

    Download Now

  • Technology to Make E-Discovery Smarter, Not Harder

    Brought to you by Nuix

    Download Now

  • Does Generative AI Have the Power to Transform Legal Services?

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • How This Personal Injury Firm Reduced Client Intake Time by 80%

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now