NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
May 31, 2007 | National Law Journal

Orrick Overpaid by Nevada Politician It Backed

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe profited -- and was overpaid by nearly $96,000 -- from improperly handled state funds, according to a bipartisan Nevada legislative audit. The payer, the Nevada College Savings Program, had been managed by then-state treasurer and current Republican Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki, a recipient of $29,000 in campaign donations from Orrick and its lawyers. Although the audit found no wrongdoing on Orrick's part, it criticized how work was given to the firm.
4 minute read
July 18, 2006 | Law.com

Pa. Justices Let Stand Record-Setting $65 Million Verdicts

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has refused to review the two largest verdicts -- worth more than $65 million -- ever handed up by Luzerne County juries. The high court's ruling upholds a decision that rejected the appeals of a sprinkler system manufacturer that was held partially liable for a warehouse fire that destroyed millions of stored documents. The Superior Court rejected the argument that the sprinkler system was not a "product" because it was not completely installed at the time of the fire.
7 minute read
September 10, 2008 | New York Law Journal

Intellectual Property Litigation

Lewis R. Clayton, a partner at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, writes that the evolution of home video recording technology continues to generate complex copyright disputes between distributors and copyright owners, in which the important rights can turn on seemingly arcane issues. The latest example concerns Cablevision's proposed "Remote Storage Digital Video Recorder system, designed to give cable subscribers the functionality of a TiVo-like personal digital video recorder.
11 minute read
April 18, 2012 | Daily Business Review

Warehouse acquired in Miami Gardens

1 minute read
June 03, 2002 | National Law Journal

Preparing the Witness

When it comes to witness preparation, don`t look for clear answers from the Rules of Evidence or the courts on what`s admissible and what`s protected.
9 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

September 20, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Commonwealth v. Sileo, PICS Case No. 11-4031 (Pa. Super. en banc Sept. 1, 2011) Bowes, J. (34 pages).

The PCRA court did not commit an error of law in considering the prejudice aspect of appellant's ineffectiveness claim and the record supported the finding that appellant was not prejudiced due to trial counsel's failure to ask for an alibi instruction. The Superior Court affirmed the order denying PCRA relief following remand by a prior three-judge panel.
4 minute read
March 05, 2007 | Connecticut Law Tribune

Rogers A Tough-Minded Jurist With Panache

When Gov. M. Jodi Rell nominated Appellate Court rookie Judge Chase T. Rogers to become the next chief justice of Connecticut's Supreme Court, Rogers said it was "both humbling and exciting" to have Rell's confidence in her leadership at "a time of great transition" in the Judicial Branch.
6 minute read
January 19, 2006 | Legaltech News

RIM: BlackBerry E-Mail Service Is Critical to U.S.

Research In Motion Ltd. says its BlackBerry e-mail device is so critical that a court-ordered shutdown of U.S. service could threaten public safety and business productivity. The Canadian company is trying to avoid a possible injunction, the result of a long-running infringement case won by NTP Inc., a tiny patent-holding firm. In a filing Tuesday in Virginia federal court, RIM argued that there is "exceptional public interest" in keeping BlackBerrys beeping.
3 minute read
October 22, 1999 | Law.com

RJ Reynolds Sued by Former Distributor

RJ Reynolds was hit with an antitrust suit brought by Pennsylvania tobacco and candy distributor Mid-Valley Candy Co. that claims the tobacco giant joined forces with another distributor to wage a smear campaign designed to drive it out of business. The suit alleges that RJR and the competing distributor "illegally combined, conspired, confederated and agreed with each other to engage in an illegal conspiracy in restraint of trade."
4 minute read
April 16, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

Akers Nat'l Roll Co. v. Allied Indus. & Serv. Workers Int'l Union, PICS Case No. 13-0816 (3d Cir. April 4, 2013) Aldisert, J. (22 pages).

The collective bargaining agreement in this union dispute was not so free from ambiguity regarding the company's exclusive right to schedule its workforce such that the arbitrator's inquiry into past practice and introduction of extrinsic evidence were not permissible; the arbitrator found a binding past practice was established and the district court should not have disturbed the award. Judgment of district court reversed.
4 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now

  • Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now

  • The Benefits of Outsourcing Beneficial Ownership Information Filing

    Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

    Download Now