0 results for 'Morris Nichols Arsht Tunnell LLP'
2014 Pro Hac Vice Ineligible List
Notice to the bar.2014 Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection PHV & MJP Ineligible Lists
Notice to the bar.Settlement Ends Trade Secrets Case Against McKinsey Duo
After repeatedly touting its lawsuit against two former executives who departed for McKinsey & Co., turnaround consultancy AlixPartners and its lawyers at Gibson Dunn quietly settled the case.Acacia Unit Socked with Fees in Alcatel Patent Fight
A judge in Delaware agreed with Alcatel-Lucent's lawyers at Goodwin Procter that the plaintiff, an Acacia subsidiary called Chalumeau Power Systems, filed a frivolous lawsuit and backed off only after Alcatel refused to negotiate a settlement.Liggett Group, Inc. v. ACE Property and Casualty Insurance Company
LIGGETT GROUP INC. and BROOKE GROUP HOLDING, INC., Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY…In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litigation
IN RE ORACLE CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION824 A.2d 917COURT OF CHANCERY OF DELAWARE NEW CASTLECONSOLIDATED C.A. No. 18751 | June 13, 2003, Decided…Third Circuit Dismisses Viacom Executive Compensation Suit
Corporations can define shareholder voting rights by setting limits on certain classes of stock, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled. Although the issue had been long settled in Delaware corporate law, the appellate court's precedential decision adopts the regulation as federal law.Third Circuit Dismisses Viacom Executive Compensation Suit
Corporations can define shareholder voting rights by setting limits on certain classes of stock, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled. Although the issue had been long settled in Delaware corporate law, the appellate court's precedential decision adopts the regulation as federal law.District Court Applies Chancery Precedent to Dismiss Compensation Suits
The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware applied Court of Chancery precedent to dismiss two shareholder lawsuits filed against the boards of ConocoPhillips Co. and Allergan Inc. In both cases, shareholders alleged that the corporations wasted resources by approving employee compensation plans, but the federal court dismissed the litigation because the shareholders had not made a demand on the board prior to initiating the lawsuits.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now
The Benefits of Outsourcing Beneficial Ownership Information Filing
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Top 10 AI Use Cases in Private Equity
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now