NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'undefined'

You can use to get even better search results
September 30, 2005 | Law.com

Heirs in $165M Suit Say Coke Ties Compromise SunTrust Banks

SunTrust Banks Inc.'s failure to diversify family trust assets that sometimes had up to 90 percent Coca-Cola stock has prompted claims against the bank. The $165 million federal suit raises questions about the bank's decades-old relationship with Coke and also will likely test the limits of attorney-client privilege between King & Spalding and its longtime clients Coke and SunTrust. The bank has identified two King & Spalding partners in the firm's trusts practice as witnesses in the case.
12 minute read
October 10, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

In re Pendleton

The Supreme Court's holding in Miller v. Alabama that mandatory life without parole for those under the age of 18 violates the Eighth Amendment is retroactive to cases on collateral review.
4 minute read
March 28, 2008 | Daily Report Online

College gossip Web site targeted by New Jersey attorney general denies breaking law

TRENTON, N.J. AP - The college gossip Web site JuicyCampus.com has criticized a consumer fraud investigation launched by the New Jersey attorney general."JuicyCampus has not violated any laws," reads an unsigned statement posted on the Web site earlier this week. The statement also accuses the attorney general of interfering with users' free speech.
2 minute read
September 24, 2009 | Law.com

3rd Circuit Says Corporations May Take Info Requests 'Personally'

Lawyers for AT&T have won a court battle with the Federal Communications Commission over whether corporations are entitled to assert claims of "personal" privacy. The FCC argued that when Congress crafted the exemptions clauses of the Freedom of Information Act, it intended the phrase "personal privacy" to extend only to human beings. But AT&T claimed that FOIA specifically defines the term "person" to include corporations. The 3rd Circuit has ruled that AT&T had the better argument.
5 minute read
January 29, 2007 | Texas Lawyer

Proposed Changes to Patent Rules May Force Execs to Re-think Strategy

On Jan. 3, 2006, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office gave notice in the Federal Register of significant proposed changes to its rules governing the practice of filing continuation patent applications, and executives may need to re-think their companies' patent strategy as a result.
8 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN View this Book

View more book results for the query "*"

December 14, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

United States ex rel. Bauchwitz v. Holloman, PICS Case No. 09-2067 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2009) Savage, J. (55 pages).

United States ex rel. Bauchwitz v. Holloman, PICS Case No. 09-2067 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2009) Savage, J. (55 pages).
3 minute read
June 26, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

Fractured Ankle Brings .1 Mil. Settlement

Safety and Wage Loss at Heart of Case
4 minute read
Giant Setback for FTC in Pay-to-Delay Crusade: Atlanta Judge Dismisses FTC Challenge to 'Reverse Payment' Settlement between Solvay and Generics
Publication Date: 2010-02-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

The Federal Trade Commission is fighting a two-front battle against deals in which brand pharma makers pay generics to keep their products off the market. It seems to be making political headway, but on Tuesday the FTC took a big blow in court--partly because of some questionable litigation strategy.

March 26, 2009 | The Recorder

Cal Law Welcomes a New Publisher

Brian Hunt succeeds Christopher Braun as publisher of The Recorder, Cal Law and GC California.
1 minute read
August 02, 2013 | New York Law Journal

Medical Literature as Evidence: A Missed Opportunity

Andrew S. Kaufman, a partner at Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan, writes: New York is in a distinct minority of jurisdictions in which published medical literature is usable on cross-examination only if the opposing expert concedes it is authoritative. Given the desire of each party to introduce supporting literature and the opposing party's reluctance to have it admitted, a curious scenario has been created in which the vast majority of experts in New York prefer to deny that anything is authoritative.
9 minute read

Resources

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now

  • Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now