0 results for '*'
With a trial set to begin Monday, SAP has stipulated that it is liable for contributory infringement of software. That leaves only damages to be determined, but the two sides are far apart: Oracle wants $2.1 billion; SAP says it should pay just a few tens of millions.
Widener Law Diversity Forum Examines Progress on Equality
America's progress toward equality in the 50 years since Martin Luther King Jr.'s iconic "I Have a Dream" speech framed the discussion of the 2013 Widener University School of Law's "Dean's Leadership Forum on Diversity."Plugging Away: Howrey Still Committed to New York Power Projec
The mortgage-backed securities machine that the credit rating agencies blessed was a new beast in our commercial world. The law could have evolved to create the right system of checks and balances, but it didn't. And that's a shame.
View more book results for the query "*"
Electrician Secures $1.2 Mil. in Construction Injury Case
An electrician who suffered spinal fractures in a fall while working on the construction of a condominium will be paid $1.2 million in a global settlement of his claims against a real estate developer and a carpentry firm.TiVo Wins Injunction Against EchoStar
TiVo attorney Morgan Chu persuaded a Texas judge to agree that EchoStar, found to be infringing patents, should stop using TiVo's technology. Now.Citigroup seizes EMI, now owns Beatles record label
EMI Group Ltd., owner of the Beatles record label, was seized by Citigroup Inc., ending owner Guy Hands' control of the more than 110-year-old record company.Jury sides against Sonnenschein in former partner dispute
A D.C. Superior Court jury Monday ruled in favor of a former Sonnenschein, Nath Rosenthal partner who alleged the firm underpaid him for his work in representing victims of the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland.The jury said Douglas Rosenthal, a former antitrust partner in Washington, should have received $1.California Supremes Say No Damages for Rights Wrongs
Individuals seeking monetary damages under the California Constitution for violations of their free speech rights and due process liberty interests are out of luck. On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Ronald George, ruled unanimously that very little in case law, legislative intent or the will of the people supports an action for damages.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Why Embracing Change Is Essential for Your Legal Department
Brought to you by DiliTrust
Download Now
International Export and Trade Assistance State Law Survey
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
How This Personal Injury Firm Reduced Client Intake Time by 80%
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
The Hidden Cost of Bad Reviews: Why Law Firms & Attorneys Can't Afford a Damaged Online Reputation
Brought to you by Erase.com
Download Now