0 results for 'undefined'
Real wages stagnant for public-interest attorneys, NALP says
The National Association for Law Placement has issued its latest round of sobering job news, and this time the depressing statistics focus on public-interest lawyer salaries.Mollison, petitioners-appellants v. United States, respondent-appellee
Purpose of IRS Summonses Legitimate Under �Powell� Even if Petitioners Bona Fide U.S. Virgin Islands ResidentsHow to Research Private Companies
When it comes to privately owned (or privately held) companies, sometimes a wealth of corporate information just isn't available. Research librarian Jocelyn Stilwell-Tong tells you where to look.View more book results for the query "*"
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital v. Cannon Design Inc.
Hospital's Professional Malpractice, Breach Claims Over Seismic Upgrade Go ForwardYale Defamation Lawsuit Becomes a Case of Mistaken Identity for Texas Attorney
A Texas attorney who has the same name as a defendant in an Internet libel suit that has drawn national media attention has asked an attorney for the plaintiffs to amend the complaint in that suit to clarify who the defendant actually is. Matthew C. Ryan made the request to Stanford Law professor Mark A. Lemley, attorney for two Yale Law School students who allege that a different Matthew C. Ryan made untrue sexually crude and derogatory remarks about them on an Internet discussion board.$10.7 Mil. Settlement Reached Over Workers' Acid Accident
Four companies have reached a $10.65 million settlement in a Philadelphia common pleas court case stemming from an accident at an automotive-battery manufacturer that left one man dead and another burned.Plycon Transportation Group v. Kirschenbaum
Attorney Sanctioned, Answer Struck For Willful Failure to Abide by Court OrdersNational Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Jeffers et al.
Because the underinsurance coverage provided to defendant by his personal Pennsylvania insurance policy (excess coverage) was not "similar" to the coverage provided by the commercial auto policy issued by plaintiff to his employer in New Jersey (gap coverage), the step-down provision limiting coverage in the New Jersey policy was not triggered, and the trial court erred in holding that the New Jersey policy did not provide additional UIM coverage above that provided by defendant's personal policy.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Expanding Your Practice Areas: How to Expand Offerings that Attract and Retain Clients
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now
Driving Value with Better Decision-Making: A Governance Maturity Checklist
Brought to you by Diligent Corporation
Download Now
Strategic Triumph: Unveiling the Secrets Behind Small Law Firms Thriving with AI Research and Drafting
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
CFIUS Compliance: Your Organization's Growth and Investment Strategy May Be a Matter of National Security
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now