0 results for 'undefined'
Appeals Court Rebukes Judge Who Cut Fee Award To Discourage Fee-Shifting
A state appeals court on Thursday had some critical words for a judge who said he routinely trims fee awards to discourage fee-shifting, calling that seat- of-the-pants policy "legally untenable."Be Prepared: Shareholder Activism Is Here to Stay
As we noted during the summer, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law in July of this year. The Dodd-Frank Act directed the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt rules that would allow greater shareholder access by requiring a company to include in its proxy materials shareholder nominees to the board of directors.Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp., Inc. v. Nowell Amoroso, P.A. et al
Although the application question regarding the law firm's knowledge is subjective, where no reasonable fact finder could conclude that the firm did not know there had been a breach of professional duty when it applied for insurance, summary judgment denying coverage is appropriate.Judge Grants Motion to Bring Penn State's Lawsuit to Phila.
A Philadelphia judge has decided to bring a lawsuit filed by Penn State against its insurance company to Philadelphia Common Pleas Court, after the insurer had filed its own lawsuit in the First Judicial District and the university countered with a separate action on its home field.View more book results for the query "*"
Defense Lawyer Hopes Web Site Will Free His Client
A Massachussets lawyer's Web site aims to generate leads to clear a client of a murder charge. The site, Who Killed Andrew Kissel?, solicits tips to provide confidential leads through e-mail and also includes discussion boards where visitors may leave comments about the case.Phila. Can Keep Wall-Wrap Ads Under Wraps, Judge Rules
A Philadelphia judge has upheld the constitutionality of the city zoning rules controlling outdoor advertising.Southwest Airlines to Support Challenge of Rule that Grounds Pilots at Age 60
Southwest Airlines plans to support a group of pilots by filing a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Supreme Court opposing the 1950s regulation that bars pilots from flying after they reach 60 regardless of their health, a Southwest spokesman said Saturday. The Federal Aviation Administration says the retirement rule is necessary for safety, but some unions and aviation organizations say the rule violates age discrimination regulations.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Practical Guidance Journal: AI in Employment Decisions and Performance
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
The Essential Guide to Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Brought to you by Diligent Corporation
Download Now
2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates
Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®
Download Now
AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now