Search Results

0 results for 'Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner'

You can use to get even better search results
REGENXBIO Inc. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-01-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Susan E. Morrison, Casey M. Kraning, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Brian D. Coggio, Jeremy T. Saks, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Kurt L. Glitzenstein, J. Peter Fasse, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, John R. Lane, Fish & Richardson P.C., Houston, TX; Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Julie S. Goldemberg, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Janice H. Logan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; William B. Raich, Michael J. Flibbert, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; Andrew M. Berdon, Robert B. Wilson, James E. Baker, Anastasia M. Fernands, Laura Fairneny, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY; Molly Moore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Washington, DC; Charles E. Lipsey, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA; Steven G. Madison, James Bieber, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case number: 20-1226-RGA

Merely combining natural gene sequences was insufficient to create a patentable invention.

January 12, 2024 | Litigation Daily

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs

Runners-up this week include litigators from Quinn Emanuel, Sidley Austin, and Skadden.
5 minute read
December 27, 2023 | Legaltech News

Data Deadlines: 5 US Data Privacy Laws Going Into Effect in 2024

Data privacy professionals are keeping an eye on the set of state laws primed to go into effect in 2024. While some laws are similar to their predecessors', others are breaking from the mold.
1 minute read
December 21, 2023 | Litigation Daily

Encore! One Last Look at 2023's Litigators of the Week

With one more LOTW set to be named tomorrow, a familiar firm has already clinched the most top spots for the year.
16 minute read
December 18, 2023 | National Law Journal

The Marble Palace Blog: A Supreme Court Icon at 100 Years Old

From World War II to beyond, a remarkable man has aided the Supreme Court.
4 minute read
November 28, 2023 | Law.com

The Practices Dominating Partner Promotions This Year: The Morning Minute

The news and analysis you need to start your day.
4 minute read
November 22, 2023 | Texas Lawyer

$210M Verdict: Dallas Jury Slaps India-Based Consulting Company

"Most of the former TransAmerica/MSI employees who are now employed by TCS had been administering and processing policies at TransAmerica / MSI using CSC software systems," the CSC complaint alleged.
3 minute read
November 20, 2023 | Corporate Counsel

The 2023 WIPL Awards: Law Firm Lifetime Achievement

For this award, Corporate Counsel recognizes women who are the thinkers, the idea women, and women who are looked at as the ones impacting change and developing new strategies for better solutions.
9 minute read
Bayer CropScience LP v. Corteva, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-11-20
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Agriculture | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rodger D. Smith, Ryan D. Stottman, Rachel R. Tunney, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Deborah E. Fishman, David Denuyl, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; David R. Marsh, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC; Aaron Stiefel, Neda Dadpey, Michael Mazzullo, Arnold & Porter Kaye Schholer LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael D. Flibbert, Pier D. DeRoo, Kassandra M. Officer, Rachael D. Dippold, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: N22C-07-168 SKR CCLD

Court declined to strike patent invalidity defense raised by licensee where it could continue to accrue royalty obligations under the terms of the license agreement despite the patents having expired and other parties who may have licensed or infringed upon the patent would also benefit from a finding of invalidity.

November 16, 2023 | The American Lawyer

The American Lawyer Names Attorney of the Year, Law Firm of the Year and More

The American Lawyer Industry Awards honored the industry's best and brightest across several categories that recognize both historical excellence and the evolution of the business of law.
6 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources