Law Schools Say Tuition Discounts Not Sustainable: Survey
Only slightly less than half of the survey respondents said their tuition discounting practices are sustainable in the long term.
October 26, 2017 at 08:00 AM
2 minute read
Most law schools say their tuition discount practices are not sustainable long term, according to survey results released Thursday from 36 schools.
The results, based on feedback from U.S.-based private nonprofit law schools, show slightly less than half of the survey respondents said their tuition discounting practices are sustainable in the long term.
The surveyed schools also reported that as tuition discounting increased between 2015 and 2016, a slight decline in net tuition revenue followed.
In general, law schools offer tuition discounts as a way to entice strong applicants and to compete for those students.
The study was sponsored by: the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO), nonprofit professional organization representing chief administrative and financial officers at more than 1,900 colleges and universities across the country; and AccessLex Institute, a nonprofit organization that does business also as AccessGroup. According to its website, Access Group ceased making loans in 2010 due to legislative action that eliminated the federally guaranteed student loan program, but it continues to service the loans it made prior to that change.
With the survey results, the researchers divided participating law schools into two groups: high and low tuition. The tuition discount at high tuition law schools increased from 33 percent from the fall of 2015 to 38 percent in the same time period in 2016. During the same interval, low tuition law schools experienced an increase from 37 percent to 39 percent, according to the report.
In their press release about the study, the two organizations noted its limitations. “Although the sample size of the survey precludes generalization to all private law schools, the data provide a glimpse into legal education discounting practices, and their potential implications for schools and students,” the release said.
.
Ken Redd, the director of research and policy analysis at NABUCO, who worked on the survey report, cast a glass-half-full account of its results. “There is a concern about borrowing and cost. But there are still a good number of law schools that have demonstrated able to attract and retain new students who are able to obtain jobs,” Redd said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of New Hampshire Law School Launches Specialized Health, Life Sciences Program
Supreme Court Takes Up Case Over Approval of Religious Charter School
The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Trending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250