New York AG Threatens Project Veritas' Fundraising Ability Over Nonprofit Filing Gaps
The conservative activist organization was asked to explain why parts of its filings with the state contained deficiencies, including not acknowledging James O'Keefe's misdemeanor conviction.
November 30, 2017 at 07:09 PM
2 minute read
New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. Photo credit: Rick Kopstein
In a letter sent Thursday, New York AG Eric Schneiderman demanded clarifications to the conservative provocateur group Project Veritas' nonprofit filings with the state. The move comes just days after the group saw a sting operation against The Washington Post unravel amid greater public scrutiny over the group's practices.
The letter, sent from the AG's charities bureau to the organization's outspoken president James O'Keefe, demands clarification on alleged deficiencies in the group's nonprofit filings with the state.
For example, despite claiming on its uniform registration statement that none of its officers had been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony, O'Keefe pleaded guilty in 2010 to misdemeanor charges in Louisiana for entering U.S. Senator Mary Landrieu's office under false pretenses.
In the letter, the AG's Office demands to know why the failure to disclose the information isn't a violation of New York law prohibiting the making of untrue statements in an application for registration.
The letter goes on to demand information on why the group was barred from soliciting funds in Mississippi and Utah, why it failed to account for the company doing fundraising for it in its filing and why it failed to register under the state's estates, powers and trusts law.
Absent a response within 15 days, the state threatened further legal action, including the cancellation of its registration to solicit funds in New York.
The Washington Post first reported on the letter's existence.
A spokesperson for Project Veritas did not provide immediate comment.
The group gained notoriety for creating videos aimed at uncovering what the group alleges are biases and hypocrisies among liberal elected officials and organizations. Earlier this week, an alleged employee for Project Veritas approached The Washington Post claiming to have been raped by Alabama Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore. When inconsistencies in the woman's story were uncovered, the paper turned the episode into a take down of the group's practices.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Contract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute read
Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 12 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 2Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
- 3Rule of Law: Is Big Law Too Shortsighted?
- 4The Empty Promise of ‘Dubin v. United States’
- 5Weil Partner Exits Raise Questions About Future Firm Leadership
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
