Want to Reduce Your Drinking and Get Healthier? Slow and Steady Does It
In his latest Well Counseled column, Patrick Krill provides tips on how lawyers can cut back on alcohol consumption and improve their well-being.
January 03, 2018 at 12:07 PM
6 minute read
Dear Patrick:
What advice do you have for lawyers (or law firms, for that matter) who may be wanting to reduce their alcohol consumption, eliminate unhealthy behaviors, or just generally strive for greater physical and mental well-being in the new year?
Allison
Dear Allison:
In a word, gradual. That's my advice. Move at a slow to moderate pace, lay a foundation, and build momentum. That is how lawyers (and firms) are most likely to succeed in improving either their individual or collective well-being. Given that the start of a new calendar year is upon us, however, it is likely that many minds are thinking about New Year's resolutions, the seductive yet evanescent fever of self-efficacy that grips Western civilization annually. If that sounds familiar, do yourself a favor and forget about it. Unless you are in or quickly approaching crisis, and your New Year's resolution is literally to check into treatment that day, ditch the plans for a Jan. 1 ribbon-cutting on a new and improved you. Lasting change takes time to cement and ultimately won't be held together by retrospective guilt over your poor life choices in 2017, no matter how powerful that guilt may currently feel.
One of the most-widely accepted and well studied models for explaining how people accomplish change in their personal lives is called the Transtheoretical Model of Change, or TTM for short. It operates on the assumption that people do not change behaviors quickly and decisively (such as through a New Year's resolution), but instead that behavior change, especially habitual behavior, occurs through a cyclical process. My experience counseling lawyers, judges and law students about overcoming their addictions and mental health problems certainly bore this model out, and the vast majority of my peers rely upon it as a useful construct to assess and describe where patients stand in their readiness and capacity for change. Although the model is typically applied to individuals, in this specific context I think it certainly works for law firms as well. I'll elaborate:
According to this model, behavior change occurs incrementally, with the individual moving from either being apathetic, unaware of the problem, or unwilling to make a change (known as the precontemplation stage), to a point where they are considering a change (contemplation), to deciding and preparing to make a change. Meaningful, committed action is then taken, with ongoing attempts to maintain the new behavior occurring over time. Relapses and returns to old behaviors are common and considered part of the process of achieving lasting change.
I'll explain each stage a little further, and I would encourage lawyers to consider where they or their firm are in this continuum, and then to reflect on what it would take to get them to the next level.
Precontemplation During the precontemplation stage, people do not consider changing a problem behavior at all. Lawyers or firms in denial may not see that advice about well-being applies to them personally, or perhaps their supreme confidence in their own abilities—or their inflated egos—convinces them that they are immune to the health problems that strike other lawyers and firms. Alternatively, they may have tried and failed to change so many times that they have now simply given up.
Contemplation During the contemplation stage, people are ambivalent about changing. The idea of giving up an enjoyed behavior evokes a sense of loss, even despite the perceived gain. During this stage, lawyers and firms are likely to assess obstacles (time, expense or fear) and benefits of change. Incidentally, it's easy for lawyers to get stuck here, as we're trained to analyze and thus are susceptible to analysis paralysis.
Preparation During the preparation stage, lawyers or firms would be—as the name suggests—preparing to make a specific change. They may test drive small changes and then ramp up from there as their determination and motivation to change increase. An individual lawyer might begin researching treatment or therapy, or exploring options for getting more exercise and managing their stress better. A firm might dip its toe in the water with something as foundational as bringing in a well-being speaker for the first time.
Action The action stage is what clinicians spend the most time trying to help their patients reach, because, as you might guess, it's where the most progress occurs. (It's also a well populated graveyard of failed New Year's resolutions. At this point, it becomes clear that if the prior stages have been bypassed, action itself may be inadequate.) In short, this step is about intentionality and concrete actions—walking the walk, so to speak, and devoting adequate time, effort and resources to facilitate the desired change.
Maintenance Maintenance and relapse-prevention involve incorporating the new behavior over the long term. Discouragement due to occasional slips backward or frustration from seemingly entrenched behavior may interrupt the change process and result in the lawyer or firm being tempted to give up, but, in a therapeutic or clinical context, most patients find themselves cycling through the stages of change several times before the desired outcome becomes firmly rooted. There is no reason to think that the experience of an individual lawyer or law firm seeking to change would be any different, so maintaining motivation and fidelity to mission are key, even in the face of setbacks.
If you or your law firm are considering making some perhaps overdue changes towards better health in 2018, understanding the mechanics of the process can be invaluable. There is no time like the present to get started, so long as you understand that effort will be required long after the motivation brought by a new year has faded beyond perceptibility.
Have a question? Send it to [email protected] and I'll see you back here soon!
Patrick R. Krill is the founder of Krill Strategies, a behavioral health consulting firm focused exclusively on the legal industry. Go to www.prkrill.com for more information.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOvercoming Hurricane Helene: How the Western North Carolina Legal Community Managed Court Closures, Sanitation Concerns
Hurricane Helene's Impact On Asheville, North Carolina: How Public and Private Attorneys Dealt With Closures, Safety and Sanitation
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250