Duke Law's Next Dean to Emphasize Tech, Innovation
Karen "Kerry" Abrams says law schools need to contemplate what the legal profession will look like in the next 50 years in order to produce in-demand graduates.
February 06, 2018 at 02:22 PM
4 minute read
The chance to lead an elite law school located in a tech hotbed was too good to pass up for Karen “Kerry” Abrams, incoming dean at Duke Law School.
The university on Feb. 2 announced the appointment of Abrams, who is currently a professor at the University of Virginia School of Law and vice provost for faculty affairs. On July 1 she will replace current Duke Dean David Levi, who is stepping down at the end of the academic year after 11 years in the position.
Abrams has been on the faculty at Virginia since 2005 and is an expert in family law and immigration law. We caught up with her this week to talk about her new gig, how technology is reshaping the legal profession and how elite law schools are faring in this tumultuous time for legal education. Her answers have been edited for length and clarity.
What appealed to you about the Duke Law deanship?
There is so much going on in the Research Triangle with technology and innovation. The Duke Law faculty are really strong in those areas, so it seemed like a really exciting opportunity that would fit my interests and skills. I was really impressed by the faculty, the students, the loyalty of the alumni, and the opportunity to be at a law school that's really integrated into a great university. And the location.
Tell me more about innovation. What do you think Duke Law is doing right in that area?
One thing they are doing really well is working with the local business and technology community through clinics and partnerships around entrepreneurship and technology. That's an area a lot of law schools have been slower to enter into. When I talk to practicing lawyers—especially those at large corporations—data security and data privacy is a big booming area of law. I think law schools in general have been a little behind to catch up to that. I think Duke is ahead of the game there and poised to be a real leader.
Do you think Duke, as an elite law school ranked No. 10 by U.S. News & World Report, is insulated from the larger economic pressures on legal education?
I don't think any school is insulated from the economic pressures. We're seeing the same changes in the legal profession that we're seeing across all industries. As work has become more global and more automated, some of the things people in various professions—including law—used to do no longer have to be done by humans. Some of them no longer have to be done by a human in that physical place. That means the nature of the work has changed, and also the number of jobs has contracted. All of the schools are reacting to that. Obviously the elite schools are in a different position in a contracting market, in that their students are still in high demand, but I think it would be misguided to think that any school—including the ones at the very top—are insulated completely. We all have to think about not just what does the profession look like now, but imagining what it might look like in 10, 20, 50 years.
What will be your priorities as dean?
I have a list of general areas I want to focus on: Support for faculty research and scholarship; taking advantage of the relationship of the university to promote cross-disciplinary work; really listening to our alumni and employers about the changing landscape of the legal profession and making sure students are being prepared to meet those challenges. Also, thinking about how to augment our public services profile as a school and how to leverage our clinics and public service programs to better serve the Durham community and an increasingly global public. I think the school is in really good shape. A lot of my first year is going to be spent listening and observing and trying to figure out what it's doing well.
What was it like at UVA and Charlottesville, Virginia, last fall during the white nationalist rally and the aftermath?
It was devastating. It was really difficult to have our community attacked in that way. The silver lining was that I think it forced all of us to think about our past as a university and as a city. And think about how we could do better going forward. But it was terrifying. I had people marching down my street, in front of my house, shouting really hateful things. I didn't think I would see that in my lifetime, up close.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
10th Circuit Raises 6th Amendment Bar for Prosecutors' Attorney-Client Violations
Judges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Watch Your Pronouns
- 2Burford Sets Sights on UAE’s Surge in Construction & Disputes
- 3Santa Barbara Judge Accused of Moonlighting as Attorney for Secretary/Girlfriend
- 4Will Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
- 5Wrongful-Death Case Against Adult Day Care Sparks Call for State Regulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250