ABA Offers Employee Buyouts Ahead of Reorganization
The lawyer organization's move comes amid an $11 million budget reduction for fiscal year 2018 and a $7.7 million operating deficit in 2017.
February 15, 2018 at 01:59 PM
3 minute read
The American Bar Association is offering its first-ever employee buyout in advance of a planned major reorganization this spring.
Employees with at least 20 years of service—and whose age and years of service combined equal at least 75—will receive 15 months of their base pay if they choose to leave, ABA executive director Jack Rives said in an interview Thursday. The buyout comes at a time when the ABA is grappling with revenue declines and a shrinking number of paid members.
Rives declined to say how many of the ABA's 910 employees qualify for the buyout. He said the organization does not have a specific goal for the number of employees who depart through the buyout program, but that those departures will help inform how the ABA restructures in the coming months. Everyone who applies for the buyout will be accepted, he said.
“When you reorganize, it frequently means you will eliminate or transform some positions,” Rives said. “I realized that if we do a substantial reorganization, which we're looking at doing probably in mid-April, we'd potentially be affecting some of our longtime, very loyal and good employees.”
The ABA's standard severance package, which is two months pay with an additional two weeks of pay for every year of service capped at 24 weeks, didn't seem appropriate for longtime employees whose jobs will be eliminated in the reorganization, Rives said. Hence, the ABA's board of governors approved the one-time buyouts with 15 months of pay as an incentive for long-serving employees to retire or move on.
“Fifteen months is a generous payout,” he said. “Some people accepted the offer within 24 hours.”
Eligible employees have until March 2 to signal that they want to take the buyout. (They have 45 days to change their minds, in accordance with federal law.) Most who take the buyout will leave the ABA on March 31, though Rives said he may ask certain key employees to stay on for longer.
That the ABA wants to shrink its employee ranks isn't terribly surprising given its financial challenges. It cut nearly $11 million from its general operations budget in fiscal year 2018. According to a presentation from treasurer Michelle Behnke to the ABA's House of Delegates last week, an additional $5 million in cuts are needed for the coming year. The ABA posted a $7.7 million operating deficit in 2017, she said.
Meanwhile, the percentage of U.S. lawyers who are ABA members has fallen from 50 percent 40 years ago to 22 percent today, Rives told the House of Delegates.The ABA is developing a new membership model it hopes will help reverse that decline.
“We're concerned about a number of trends we're seeing, including the percentage of America's lawyer who are members and the number of dues-paying members we have,” Rives said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250