Moonves to Fight for $120M Severance in Arbitration With CBS
CBS said in a filing with the SEC that Moonves had informed the company Wednesday that he intended to use a binding arbitration provision in his contract to try to recover his "golden parachute" after the company determined there were grounds to fire him for cause.
January 17, 2019 at 03:45 PM
4 minute read
CBS Corp. announced Thursday that Les Moonves, who resigned as CEO in September amid allegations of sexual harassment, was challenging the company's decision last month to deny him his $120 million severance package.
CBS said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that Moonves had informed the company Wednesday that he intended to use a binding arbitration provision in his contract to try to recover his “golden parachute” after the company determined there were grounds to fire him for cause. The development was first reported Thursday morning by The Wall Street Journal.
CBS said that it did not plan to comment further while the arbitration was pending.
The company announced Dec. 17 that an investigation had concluded Moonves violated company policies, breached his employment agreement and failed to fully cooperate with a probe into allegations that he had forced himself on women and retaliated against those who rebuffed his advances.
New York-based Dechert partner Andrew J. Levander, an attorney for Moonves, last month attacked the decision as “foreordained,” telling media organizations that his client “vehemently denies any non-consensual sexual relations and cooperated extensively and fully with investigators.” Levander did not return a call Thursday seeking comment on the arbitration.
Under the terms of Moonves' contract, the confidential arbitration proceedings will be conducted before the American Arbitration Association in New York, under the laws of the Empire State. CBS and Moonves would each get to select one arbitrator, who in turn would agree on a third to round out the three-member panel.
The arbitrators' decision would be “final and conclusive.” Appeals in arbitration cases are exceedingly rare and typically require a showing of egregious conduct by arbitrators, such as fraud or undisclosed bias on the panel.
Should Moonves prevail on at least one claim, CBS would bear his attorney fees and the costs of arbitration. If Moonves loses, however, the parties would split costs and each pay their own attorney fees, according to the terms of Moonves' contract.
Barry H. Genkin, a partner at Blank Rome in Philadelphia, said the move from Moonves came as no surprise after CBS's decision to deny his severance, and private arbitration presented little downside for the former executive, after months of bruising headlines regarding his personal conduct.
“There's little cost for Moonves,” Genkin said. “From his perspective, I guess he can't end up any worse than he is now.”
The sides could still agree to a settlement. However, CBS has faced pressure over its handling of sexual harassment allegations, and the company has given no indication that it intends to make any payment to Moonves, making arbitration an all-or-nothing venture for the former executive.
“I don't think that this is a situation where there's a likelihood” of a settlement, Genkin said. “I have every reason to believe CBS is going to stick firmly to the position it has taken so far.”
In August, the company tapped Covington & Burling and Debevoise & Plimpton to investigate Moonves' conduct after The New Yorker reported that he had engaged in a pattern of abusive behavior for decades and used his position to threaten women who rejected him. Moonves said that he regretted making women feel uncomfortable, but he has denied allegations of abuse and retaliation.
CBS announced in September that it had reached a settlement with its controlling shareholder, National Amusements Inc., in a Delaware court case to have Moonves leave the company. Moonves and CBS agreed to donate $20 million to organizations that support the #MeToo movement, but the company made Moonves' $120 million severance package dependent on a determination of whether there was reason to fire him with cause.
In December, CBS said the investigation found that Moonves had engaged in “willful and material misfeasance.” Though harassment and retaliation were not pervasive at the company, CBS said it had “begun to take robust steps to improve the working environment for all employees.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read'Transforming Children Into ATMs'?: Roblox, Epic Games Sued for Allegedly Fueling Addictive Behavior in Minors
Trending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 2Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 3Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 4Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 5Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250