Jury Awards Manchester Man Injured in Six-Car Crash $231,023
Michael Kelly, who suffered neck and back injures following a crash on Interstate 95 in West Haven three years ago, was awarded $231,023 by a Hartford jury last week. Kelly, his attorney said, still has headaches and nightmares stemming from the accident.
August 30, 2018 at 01:03 PM
4 minute read
A Connecticut Superior Court jury has awarded $231,023 to a 31-year-old Manchester man who sustained serious neck and back injuries in a six-car collision in March 2015.
After hearing two days of testimony—including that of the injured driver—the six-person Hartford jury deliberated six hours before rendering its verdict on Aug. 23.
Plaintiff Michael Kelly was injured after a 2009 Audi, driven by Joseph Annunziata, struck the left back-end of the 2008 silver Nissan Altima he was driving on Interstate 95 in West Haven, according to Lawyer Twillie, Kelly's Hartford-based attorney.
Annunziata, Twillie said, was in the left of three lanes traveling northbound where “he was driving too fast. Traffic slowed down in front of him and he realized he would not be able to stop in time. He slammed his breaks, cut his wheels to the right and struck my client's car.”
Then, Twillie said, Kelly's car span out of control, counter-clockwise, and hit two other vehicles before coming to a stop.
“My client said the driver was going at or near 55 miles per hour. The defendant said he was barely moving and was in stop-and-go traffic.” said Twillie, an associate with The Haymond Law Firm. “But, you don't spin out of control if the other driver is doing stop-and-go speeds.” Annunziata was ticketed for unsafe lane change. A lawsuit was filed in Hartford Superior Court in January 2017.
The crash, Twillie said, caused Kelly to have not only neck and back injuries but also a herniated disc, a bulging disc, loss of range of motion, severe headaches and blurred vision, among other injuries.
Twillie said testimony by Stephen Pedro, Kelly's chiropractor, “definitely swayed the jury.”
“He really explained the injuries, the symptoms of the injuries and the long-term prognosis of his back and neck pain,” said Twillie, who noted the injuries are most likely going to be permanent.
Kelly, Twillie said Thursday, testified for 2 1/2 hours during trial “that he still has nightmares because of the accident. It's also really affected his job in that he is a content writer for Hartford Insurance. It is difficult for him to work when there is weakness and numbness in his hands and he has headaches from looking at the computer screen.”
While the defendant initially denied liability, Annunziata “admitted liability at the last minute, at the eve of trial,” Twillie said. “His testimony at trial was no longer needed.”
Twillie said his biggest obstacle as the attorney on the case “was dealing with the six-month gap in [medical] treatment” on the part of Kelly. Twillie said immediately after the accident, his client went to the emergency room at Yale New Haven Hospital.
“The defense made that six-month gap an issue, but my client testified credibly that he was receiving bills from the hospital for thousands of dollars and he was focused on paying those bills as opposed to [getting treatment] and racking up more bills,” Twillie said.
Kelly, who incurred $20,036 in past medical expenses and is expected to spend another $50,000 in the future, did not have any surgeries. Instead, Twillie noted, he has been treated with chiropractic care.
Today, Twillie said, Kelly “still has numbness and weakness and radiating pain in both arms that appear to be permanent. He also has radiating pain into his right hip. And, he has headaches when he tilts his head down to read or for an extended period of time.”
The defense has until Sept. 12 to appeal the case to the Connecticut Appellate Court. Attorney F. Thomas Pachler represents the defendant. Pachler did not respond to a request for comment Thursday.
While Annunziata admitted liability on the eve of trial, in court papers he previously denied much of the allegations laid out in the lawsuit. In fact, those court papers showed that Annunziata denied he was careless and negligent and denied that he was speeding, failed to apply his brakes and failed to keep a reasonable and proper lookout for other vehicles.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
2 minute readMajor Drug Companies Agree to Pay $49.1 Million to 50 States, Territories
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250