Podhurst Orseck Coordinates Work Generating $1.5 Billion in Takata Air Bag Settlements
Most Effective Lawyers: Class action — The Podhurst Orseck team coordinated the work of more than two dozen law firms in class actions against automakers that used recalled Takata air bags.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Peter Prieto, Matthew Weinshall, John Gravante and Alissa Del Riego
Podhurst Orseck
Podhurst Orseck partner Peter Prieto serves as chair lead counsel for plaintiffs in the Takata air bags multidistrict litigation, one of the largest in the nation involving the largest automotive recall in U.S. history.
After more than two years of litigation, the legal team's work on behalf of over 40 million plaintiffs paid off. In October 2017 and February 2018, groundbreaking class action settlements were approved by U.S. District Judge Federico Moreno in Miami with six automakers for a total of $1.2 billion.
In July, Ford agreed to settle for an additional $299 million. Final approval is pending.
The settlements with Toyota, Mazda, Subaru, BMW, Nissan and Honda came three years after the litigation began. Prieto with the assistance of Podhurst lawyers Matthew Weinshall, helped secure the large-scale payouts.
The newest defendants include General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz, which also installed Takata inflators in their vehicles.
The MDL is a result of air bags supplied by Takata that have been recalled worldwide because of a defect that makes its inflators prone to explode. The lawsuit claims the defect is linked to the use of inexpensive and volatile ammonium nitrate, which sometimes spews shrapnel at occupants. At least 20 deaths and hundreds of injuries have been blamed on defective air bags.
Motorists have alleged a decadelong scheme by Takata and automakers to conceal the defect from regulators and class members.
To prosecute the claims against Takata and the automakers, the Podhurst Orseck team oversaw and coordinated the work of more than two dozen law firms with over 200 lawyers and paralegals. The MDL lawyers defeated motions to dismiss, reviewed over 10 million pages of documents and took or defended more than 150 depositions.
The settlements provide compensation for economic losses resulting from the recall including reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, a residual distribution payment of up to $500, rental cars for the most at-risk class members while they wait for remedies and a customer-support program for repairs and adjustments on replacement inflators, including an extended warranty.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
3 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readDisbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250