$53 Million Judgment Follows Retrial Before New Judge
Most Effective Lawyers: Complex/business litigation — Attorneys for Miami-Dade County's toll-by-plate operator won two trials but face another appeal.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Michael Piscitelli and Brad Copenhaver
Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli
Lawrence Silverman and Gerald Cope Jr.
Akerman
After an extensive tour through the courts, attorneys from Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli and Akerman obtained a favorable final order for Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp. in a lawsuit against the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority, which is now on appeal.
The county originally contracted with ETC in 2009 to provide a toll collection and accounting system for the five major Miami-Dade expressways when SunPass transponders aren't used.
After a major falling out, ETC sought $58 million in damages for contract payments for the toll-by-plate system used on the toll roads. MDX responded with a $25 million counterclaim for liquidated damages under the contract for late or faulty performance.
In 2012, the court granted summary judgment against ETCC on a significant portion of its claims. In 2015, a three-week bench trial was held, and the court tentatively awarded $28 million in damages to ETC against MDX, reversed the previous summary judgment ruling and reopened the case for further evidence on damages.
MDX responded by asking to disqualify the judge, and the disqualification was ordered by the Third District Court of Appeal in 2017, teeing up a retrial.
Following a second three-week trial, Miami Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas awarded $43 million in damages to ETC last December and entered a $53.3 million final judgment including interest in January.
“It was a big-deal case, very expensive on both sides,” Michael Piscitelli of Vezina, Lawrence & Piscitelli in Fort Lauderdale said in April after a rehearing request was denied. The retrial “was quite a bit more contentious.”
MDX attorney Joseph Serota of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman in Coral Gables filed a notice of appeal, extending the life of the long case.
Piscitelli said the company's two law firms plan to co-author the appellate brief due next year.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250