Lesson No. 1, Avoid Cross-Examination by Divorce Lawyer Jeff Fisher
Most Effective Lawyers: Family/probate — Fisher says it comes down to preparation, but he has a knack for catching divorcing parties in lies and with fake documents.
December 10, 2018 at 05:00 AM
2 minute read
Jeff Fisher
Fisher Potter Hodas
Jeff Fisher has carved out a niche for himself in divorces of the rich, famous or not.
in a divorce trial last June, Fisher represented the husband when the wife, a trust fund heiress, sought an unequal division of property. She claimed she didn't know she had changed many assets to joint property with the husband. The West Palm Beach attorney considered his cross-examination of her the crucial part of the case.
The court denied the wife's claim for unequal distribution and found her “testimony consisted of a litany of self-serving and contradictory excuses that lack any degree of credibility (particularly in the face of cross examination).”
The issue of post-judgment enforcement came up in May when Fisher represented the wife against her ex-husband, who owned half of an insurance company worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
Their settlement agreement included provisions for equitable distribution to the wife, but the husband skipped the payments and argued they were contingent on events that didn't occur.
Through discovery, depositions and motions, Fisher built a case that was resolved on the eve of trial. The ex-husband withdrew all of his “defenses that he asserted to excuse his failure to timely pay the wife the amounts owed to her.”
In November 2017, Fisher represented third parties with the largest financial interest in a well-publicized divorce in South Florida. Fisher dug through thousands of documents at locations controlled by the husband to unearth material proving the husband wasn't candid with the court.
Again, cross-examination was crucial in a seven-day injunction hearing. The court concluded the husband offered a falsified document as evidence and “concocted a false story about its recent 'discovery' with [his lawyer] for the purpose of defrauding the court about the key, disputed issues in the case.” The husband's pleading were struck.
Fisher is willing to share his wealth of particularized legal knowledge. He teaches a short course called Advanced Topics in Family Law at the University of Miami School of Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
2 minute read'You Lied to the Jury': Veteran Awarded $5 Million in Defamation Case Against CNN
4 minute readVedder Price Shareholder Javier Lopez Appointed to Miami Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250