Harvard Law School Students Create Evisort to Improve Contract Review
Evisort's algorithms analyze language in contracts, and can classify and categorize the content.
January 22, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Not every lesson learned at Harvard Law School takes place in a classroom. One startup, Evisort, was created by Harvard Law School students who saw the need to bring efficiency to the analysis and review of legal documents.
Originally, the students were not even planning to start a company. But they began working on Evisort's development after speaking with attorneys who told them about the inefficiencies found in the legal industry, especially as the volume of data skyrockets.
Evisort's algorithms analyze language in contracts, and can classify and categorize the content. The Harvard students realized that by using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, Evisort could help enterprises manage contracts across organizations via machine learning and AI. They used the Harvard Innovation Lab (i-lab) to further develop their theories.
Evisort was built in conjunction with graduate students and researchers at MIT. Among the AI techniques in use are deep learning, neural networks, as well as custom-built models. As a result, accurate data is provided much quicker, and the improved process frees up attorneys so they can provide legal judgment when reviewing documents.
Jerry Ting, Evisort's co-founder and CEO, told Legaltech News, “Our algorithms were developed by our team members, beginning with our first proof of concept nearly two years ago. Since then, we've built up a suite of algorithms aimed at tackling the different types of data within contracts, and a platform that allows users to leverage the powerful algorithms we run on their contracts.
“We've been supported by lawyers all around the country who've provided input, feedback, and even pressure-tested our platform for us, to ensure our development was of the highest caliber,” he added.
Ting said that companies “struggle to manage their legal documents. Evisort removes the need for expensive, tedious, and inaccurate human review.”
Operational data is extracted from scanned documents to help general counsel, controllers, sales professionals, and other company staff, Ting added. Among the departments which can benefit from the technology are legal, compliance, accounting and finance.
“These are highly trained, highly paid, and intelligent people who are spending their time searching for documents, copying and pasting, and scrolling—tasks that a computer could do,” Ting said. “At the same time, lawyers, especially in-house, are operating on limited resources and are stretched thin.
“So we set out to build a platform that could augment their tasks, allowing them to focus on the important, analytical, and complex issues facing them while automating the tedious repetitive tasks, like looking for provisions, dates, and specific terms,” he said.
Contract review becomes faster and more accurate through Evisort, the company added in a release. It allows for large-scale contract review processes. Companies also will have access to more data.
“With Evisort's six layers of artificial intelligence, going from the type of contract to the specific termination provision, users can mix and match what they look for across entire corpuses of data,” Ting said.
Also, it aims to cut down on inefficiency and lost revenue. “Right now, a lot of the data within contracts are dead, lost in scanned PDF documents where the only way to access the data is by manually reading the documents,” Ting said. “Data that could drive negotiations, pricing, and strategy are lost. Other data that they rely on … takes time, and key details may be missed, like in the M&A due diligence process. Billions of dollars of revenue are lost because of missed renewals and upsell opportunities for sales teams, data that could be easily accessed and processes that could be easily automated using Evisort's powerful AI modules.”
Currently, the Evisort platform is in the market and is in active use by clients. According to the company, it has already been tested on over a million contracts for accuracy and scalability.
Moreover, Evisort provides a range of consulting services, such as on document organization, creating a competitive business advantage through AI, moving to the cloud, and offering customized training programs. “Lawyers across every company are struggling to find a way to manage their contracts, and we're excited to be tackling the problem during such an exciting time,” Ting said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250