Here Are Big Pharma's Go-To Law Firms for Opioid Marketing Defense
ALM takes a look at which law firms the pharmaceutical industry is turning to for representation in this nationwide spate of opioid marketing litigation.
November 15, 2017 at 06:21 PM
4 minute read
When 28 Wisconsin counties sued several pharmaceutical companies last week, they became among the latest government entities in a wave of litigation accusing the industry of contributing to the prescription opioid and heroin addiction epidemic gripping the country.
From California to New Hampshire, dozens of lawsuits in federal, state and county courts are alleging that Big Pharma inundated the country with painkillers by deceiving doctors and the public about their safety. Many of the cases were brought by plaintiffs lawyers who have teamed up with governments to sue the companies through contingency-fee agreements.
But the recent spate of litigation over the companies' targeted campaigns allegedly claiming that their opioids could be prescribed nonaddictively also has stirred up a significant amount of defense work for Big Law firms. ALM examined court filings in some of these cases to see which firms appear regularly. (The following is by no means a comprehensive list of defense firms that are representing Big Pharma in opioid-marketing litigation.)
OxyContin and Dilaudid manufacturer Purdue Pharma Inc. brought out the big guns: Serving on its legal defense team is Patrick Fitzgerald, a former—and longest-serving—U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago and a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom since 2012. Fitzgerald is arguably best known for his role as the special prosecutor appointed to investigate leaks in the Valerie Plame matter. He also led the high-profile investigation and prosecution of former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich on federal corruption charges. Purdue also regularly turns to Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan for its defense work in this area.
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., maker of Actiq and Fentora, two fentanyl medications, likewise uses Quinn Emanuel for this opioid-related defense work. But the Pennsylvania-based subsidiary of an Israeli company also turns to Philadelphia-based Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, employing lawyers in several of the firm's offices on the various litigation matters.
The main go-to firm for Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., which makes Duragesic and Nucynta, also fentanyl medications, is West Coast-based O'Melveny & Myers, led by partner Charles Lifland. And it's not Lifland's first time defending the drug company over marketing claims. He was part of the litigation team that in 2014 was instrumental in reversing $1.4 billion in civil penalties and attorney fees against J&J and a subsidiary over marketing of the antipsychotic medication Risperdal. According to Lifland's firm bio, leading technology, energy, pharmaceutical and medical device companies, including Exxon Mobil Corp., J&J and Merck & Co. Inc., turn to the Los Angeles-based partner for their most important litigation matters.
For Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., maker of Opana and Percocet, it's generally Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer all the time. Attorney Anthony Boccanfuso and partner Ingo Sprie, both in the firm's New York office, are handling some of the more recently filed suits, including one brought by the state of Ohio in May, as well as dozens filed on behalf of various New York counties over the past few months.
A relatively new twist in the opioid-marketing litigation is to go after the drug distributors, namely Amerisource Bergen Corp., Cardinal Health and McKesson Corp., rather than the manufacturers. The first government entity to do so was the Cherokee Nation, which alleged in an April lawsuit that the companies violated tribal and federal laws by turning a blind eye as prescription painkillers flooded the streets. The drug distributing giants have turned to various firms in Tulsa, Oklahoma, including Crowe & Dunlevy for Amerisource Bergen; Doerner, Saunders, Daniel & Anderson for McKesson; and Hall Estill and Norman Wohlgemuth Chandler Jeter Barnett & Ray for Cardinal Health. But Cardinal Health didn't keep it all in Oklahoma. Also listed as counsel on the company's June 12 motion to dismiss are three attorneys from the Washington, D.C., office of Williams & Connolly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Exchange’s ‘Meteoric Rise’ Leads to Nationwide Class Action Trend
4 minute read'The Tobacco Industry of This Decade': Slew of Class Actions Accuse DraftKings of Creating Addicts
5 minute readPentagon Settles Suit Seeking to Clear Records of Service Members Discharged for Being LGBTQ
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Buchalter Hires Longtime Sheppard Mullin Real Estate Partner as Practice Chair
- 2A.I. Depositions: Court Reporters Are Watching Texas Case
- 3Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
- 435 Years After CT's Affordable Housing Act, Progress Remains a Struggle
- 5Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250