Troubled Law School Loses Restraining Order Bid Against ABA Over Admissions Practices
WMU-Cooley Law School claims that the ABA's accrediting body unlawfully posted a letter on its website stating that the law school was out of compliance.
December 13, 2017 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has chided Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School for creating its own public-relations problems and has denied its bid to block the American Bar Association from posting a noncompliance letter about the school's admissions practices.
Judge Arthur Tarnow, in dismissing Cooley's motion for a temporary restraining order against the ABA, said the school made the bed it claimed to be lying in.
“Cooley's decision to institute, and proceed with, this action is the primary cause for the reputational harm alleged,” wrote Tarnow, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, in the Tuesday decision. “Over the past few weeks, the letter and information about this lawsuit have been widely disseminated in the public sphere.”
Cooley law school, located in Lansing, Michigan, filed the lawsuit last month claiming that the ABA's accrediting body unlawfully posted a letter on its website stating that the law school was out of compliance with the standard that requires law schools to “only admit applicants who appear capable of satisfactorily completing its program of legal education and being admitted to the bar.”
Cooley had argued that despite a Department of Education regulation that calls for the ABA to post notices of determinations of noncompliance, the ABA was prohibited from doing so in this instance because the determination about Cooley was not final.
The ABA website at issue includes noncompliance letters issued to other schools, including Florida Coastal School of Law, Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, University of Buffalo Law School-SUNY and Appalachian School of Law.
Since August 2016, the ABA has publicly disciplined 10 law schools for admitting students that it says are unlikely to graduate and pass the bar—an unprecedented crackdown, given that such actions historically are rare.
Cooley's bar pass rate, according to the latest data available through the ABA, was 59.75 percent for test takers in February and July of 2015. The state pass rate was 71.77 percent.
Tarnow found that the law school had not demonstrated an ability to succeed on the merits of its lawsuit. He also found that the school failed to prove irreparable harm from the publication of the letter, pointing out, through precedent, that Cooley's own lawsuit “garnered the attention of the media.” The judge also determined that blocking the posting of the letter would create substantial harm to prospective students applying to law schools and was not in the interest of the public.
A spokesman for Cooley law school said the court “expressly held that 'Cooley may continue to litigate its claim that the ABA acted illegally in publishing the Letter.' The law school does intend to continue with the litigations.”
An ABA spokesman said that the Council of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the bar “is pleased with the decision of the court in denying the TRO.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDapper Labs $4M Settlement, $1.3M in Attorney Fees Reveal NFT Settlement Trend
4 minute readSplit 4th Circuit Ruling Is a Win for Covington & Burling in US Army Base Attack Litigation
3 minute read3rd Circuit Judges Zero In on Constitutional Challenges to Medicare Drug Pricing Program
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250