Troubled Law School Loses Restraining Order Bid Against ABA Over Admissions Practices
WMU-Cooley Law School claims that the ABA's accrediting body unlawfully posted a letter on its website stating that the law school was out of compliance.
December 13, 2017 at 02:44 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has chided Western Michigan University Thomas M. Cooley Law School for creating its own public-relations problems and has denied its bid to block the American Bar Association from posting a noncompliance letter about the school's admissions practices.
Judge Arthur Tarnow, in dismissing Cooley's motion for a temporary restraining order against the ABA, said the school made the bed it claimed to be lying in.
“Cooley's decision to institute, and proceed with, this action is the primary cause for the reputational harm alleged,” wrote Tarnow, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, in the Tuesday decision. “Over the past few weeks, the letter and information about this lawsuit have been widely disseminated in the public sphere.”
Cooley law school, located in Lansing, Michigan, filed the lawsuit last month claiming that the ABA's accrediting body unlawfully posted a letter on its website stating that the law school was out of compliance with the standard that requires law schools to “only admit applicants who appear capable of satisfactorily completing its program of legal education and being admitted to the bar.”
Cooley had argued that despite a Department of Education regulation that calls for the ABA to post notices of determinations of noncompliance, the ABA was prohibited from doing so in this instance because the determination about Cooley was not final.
The ABA website at issue includes noncompliance letters issued to other schools, including Florida Coastal School of Law, Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, Thomas Jefferson School of Law, University of Buffalo Law School-SUNY and Appalachian School of Law.
Since August 2016, the ABA has publicly disciplined 10 law schools for admitting students that it says are unlikely to graduate and pass the bar—an unprecedented crackdown, given that such actions historically are rare.
Cooley's bar pass rate, according to the latest data available through the ABA, was 59.75 percent for test takers in February and July of 2015. The state pass rate was 71.77 percent.
Tarnow found that the law school had not demonstrated an ability to succeed on the merits of its lawsuit. He also found that the school failed to prove irreparable harm from the publication of the letter, pointing out, through precedent, that Cooley's own lawsuit “garnered the attention of the media.” The judge also determined that blocking the posting of the letter would create substantial harm to prospective students applying to law schools and was not in the interest of the public.
A spokesman for Cooley law school said the court “expressly held that 'Cooley may continue to litigate its claim that the ABA acted illegally in publishing the Letter.' The law school does intend to continue with the litigations.”
An ABA spokesman said that the Council of the ABA Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the bar “is pleased with the decision of the court in denying the TRO.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmerican Bar Association Calls for Enforceable Supreme Court Ethics Code
Fired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute read‘What’s Different About Jarkesy?’ 5th Circuit Weighs if FCC Forfeiture Order Is Constitutional
Trending Stories
- 1Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
- 2Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 3Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 4'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 5Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250