Judge Approves Expanded Opioid MDL Leadership Team
A federal judge has approved a plaintiffs leadership team in the opioid litigation that's expected to get bigger—much bigger.
January 04, 2018 at 05:03 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge has approved a plaintiffs leadership team in the opioid litigation that's expected to get bigger—much bigger.
U.S. District Judge Dan Polster in Ohio on Thursday approved a team of 22 lawyers to spearhead more than 180 lawsuits brought over the opioid epidemic, which has led to a public health crisis across the nation. The team reads like a “Who's Who” in mass torts and includes many of the same lawyers who obtained the $246 billion settlement with Big Tobacco. The proposed slate was submitted in a court filing on Wednesday, complete with an organizational chart that shows various committees and working groups in which several more attorneys would be named. Overseeing those groups would be a plaintiffs steering committee, whose membership has yet to be decided.
“I anticipate there will be dozens of more law firms involved than are identified in the current time,” said Joe Rice, co-lead counsel on the team. “As to who they'll be, and what their role will be, will be largely dictated on how the court will organize the case.”
Peter Weinberger, managing partner of Cleveland's Spangenberg Shibley & Liber, who is one of three liaison counsel on the team, wrote in an email that he planned to submit additional names to the leadership slate following a Jan. 9 hearing, at which Polster has indicated he could decide the structure of the MDL and whether to appoint a special master.
The slate approved on Thursday includes the most senior positions, including three co-lead counsel and 16 members of an executive committee. The membership was slightly revised from the original leadership team proposed last month after Polster ordered that two lawyers representing nongovernmental entities—specifically, hospitals and third-party payors—should be included. He also limited the number of attorneys from the same law firm who could be on the executive committee. That dropped Jayne Conroy of Simmons Hanly Conroy, Burton LeBlanc of Baron & Budd and Linda Singer of Motley Rice from the executive committee. Paul Hanly of Simmons Hanly and Rice, of Motley Rice, are co-lead counsel, along with Paul Farrell of West Virginia's Greene, Ketchum, Farrell, Bailey & Tweel. Roland Tellis of Baron & Budd is on the executive committee.
Morgan & Morgan also was added to the executive committee after objecting to a selection process that took place at the Hilton Cleveland Downtown Hotel last month.
“West Virginia and Appalachia, more especially, is the epicenter to the opioid epidemic,” said James Young, the Morgan & Morgan partner in Jacksonville, Florida, who was named to the revised slate. Young was special counsel to the attorney general in Florida, prosecuting pharmaceutical fraud cases. His firm has filed nine opioid cases on behalf of cities in West Virginia.
He said the ordinary leadership structures in most MDLs—usually limited to lead counsel, an executive committee and plaintiffs steering committee—wouldn't work in the opioid litigation because it's “simply too big.”
“I think of it as a collection of MDLs within a single consolidated proceeding,” he said. “There are multiple defendants, which is a bit of a rarity, and multiple theories, in terms of governmental entities, different damages elements, causes of action. It's a very complex, huge piece of historic litigation.”
Those myriad parties and claims have complicated the creation of a leadership team. Claims against distributors, for instance, have focused on the failures of those companies to flag unusually large orders of opioids, while manufacturers have faced allegations of falsely marketing the prescription painkillers as not addictive.
The approved leadership slate would include separate co-chairs focused on the disparate claims against seven manufacturers and five groups of distributors.
In addition, the majority of the cases have been brought by governmental entities, like states, counties and cities, but hospitals, labor unions and Native American tribes also have brought suits—all of which would be represented on the leadership team.
After two groups of lawyers raised concerns last month that the original leadership slate did not include nongovernmental plaintiffs, Polster ordered that lawyers be appointed to represent hospitals and third-party payors.
The revised slate on Wednesday includes James Dugan of The Dugan Law Firm in New Orleans, for third-party payors, and Don Barrett of Barrett Law Group in Lexington, Mississippi, for hospital plaintiffs.
The lawyer who objected on behalf of hospitals, J. Nixon Daniel of Beggs & Lane in Pensacola, Florida, filed a motion on Wednesday arguing that he should have been appointed to that slot—either in addition to or in place of Barrett. Neither Daniel nor Barrett responded to requests for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
5 minute read'Rapidly Closing Window': Progressive Groups Urge Senate Votes on Biden's Judicial Nominees
5 minute read11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250