Judge in AT&T Merger Case Shuts Down Bid for Trump-DOJ Communication
“[AT&T and Time Warner] have fallen far short of establishing that this enforcement action was selective—that is, that there 'exist persons similarly situated who have not been prosecuted,'” U.S. District Senior Judge Richard Leon said in a ruling Tuesday.
February 20, 2018 at 03:09 PM
4 minute read
Judge Richard Leon. Photo Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected AT&T Inc.'s quest for U.S. Department of Justice communications with the Trump White House over the company's proposed acquisition of Time Warner.
U.S. District Senior Judge Richard Leon of the District of Columbia said AT&T, represented by O'Melveny & Myers, and Time Warner had failed to meet the “rigorous standard” for compelling discovery based on their belief that they had been singled out by the Justice Department and that the antitrust challenge reflected selective enforcement.
Lawyers for AT&T have been exploring whether the government's lawsuit challenging the deal was rooted in President Donald Trump's personal opposition rather than antitrust laws.
“[AT&T and Time Warner] have fallen far short of establishing that this enforcement action was selective—that is, that there 'exist persons similarly situated who have not been prosecuted,'” Leon wrote.
AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson has publicly questioned the Justice Department's motives for challenging the company's proposed $85 billion takeover of Time Warner. He has noted that the Justice Department does not typically challenge so-called vertical mergers, which combine companies at separate stages of the supply chain for a particular service.
As a presidential candidate in 2016, Trump spoke in opposition to the deal and vowed to block it if elected. “It's too much power in the hands of too few,” he said. During that election and his presidency, he has repeatedly expressed his dismay with Time Warner-owned CNN, and in July, The New York Times reported that the administration discussed using the acquisition deal as possible leverage in its disputes with the news network.
In court last week, a Justice Department lawyer acknowledged the president's animus but said it would not help AT&T and Time Warner's defense. The Justice Department sued to block the proposed tie-up in November, alleging the deal would substantially hurt competition and drive up prices for millions of U.S. consumers.
“Look, the president is unhappy with CNN. We don't dispute that,” Justice Department attorney Craig Conrath said in court last week. “But AT&T wants to turn that into a 'get out of jail free' card.”
O'Melveny & Myers partner Dan Petrocelli pointed to remarks the head of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, Makan Delrahim, made before the election in which he said he saw no issues with the proposed deal. Petrocelli said a government report obtained in discovery showed prices for the company's services would go down after the merger.
“It just confirmed that there's no 'there' there,” Petrocelli said.
Leon's ruling is posted in full below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250