Columbia Law, Embracing GRE for Fall 2018, Is Latest School to Join Wave
Harvard Law School's decision in March to allow applicants to submit either an LSAT or GRE score was predicted to prompt followers.
October 17, 2017 at 02:12 PM
3 minute read
|
Columbia Law School will join six other law schools, including Harvard and Georgetown University, in accepting the Graduate Record Exam for admission as an alternative to the LSAT.
Columbia announced Tuesday that it will accept the GRE scores from applicants to its three-year J.D. program beginning on a trial basis in fall 2018.
Harvard Law School in March became the second law school that said it would accept the GRE for admission. Last year, the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law was the first American Bar Association-accredited school to announce it would accept the GRE as an alternative to the LSAT.
A recent Kaplan Test Prep survey showed 25 percent of the 128 admissions officials who responded said they intended to allow both the GRE and LSAT in the near future. Earlier this month, the Washington University School of Law in St. Louis said it would begin accepting the GRE or the LSAT from applicants for seats next fall. Law schools at Northwestern University and the University of Hawaii also have embraced the alternative test. The University of California at Los Angeles School of Law allows graduate students on the UCLA campus to apply with their GRE scores.
Gillian LesterColumbia, in its announcement, said the GRE will allow a broader pool of candidates to apply to the school. Taking the GRE, the school said, could be particularly attractive to those whose academic or professional pursuits have not aligned with the study of law. The GRE is used for admission to most advanced degree programs outside of business, law and medicine.
“The world has become increasingly interconnected and it is part of our mission to prepare students to address the challenges brought on by change,” Columbia Dean Gillian Lester said. “To that end, we are devoted more than ever to assembling classes that comprise the broadest possible array of talents, skills, interests, experiences and backgrounds.”
To comply with American Bar Association standards, the law school conducted a study that used a data privacy technique to evaluate the GRE performance of current and past Columbia Law School students. The study concluded the GRE is comparable to the LSAT in predicting success in the first year of law school at Columbia.
The law school also said accepting the GRE would reduce costs for applicants who otherwise would have to prepare and sit for an additional test. The reduced costs, in turn, would aid the law school in keeping Columbia more accessible for qualified students regardless of socioeconomic status.
The law school said it will continue to use a holistic admissions policy in which applicants will be reviewed based on factors that include academic record, writing caliber, recommendations and individual characteristics.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Senior Marketing Professionals Can Transition to the Legal World
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250