Inside the Court for Trump v. Hawaii | Feuding Footnotes: Alito v. Sotomayor | Justices Decline Legal Malpractice Dispute
Go inside the Supreme Court for the dramatic announcement of the Trump v. Hawaii ruling, and scroll down for our report on a legal malpractice case -- involving an arbitration clause -- that the justices have declined to hear. Thanks for reading SCB!
June 27, 2018 at 07:30 AM
2 minute read
We've arrived. The Supreme Court this morning is expected to put a wrap on the October 2017 term. Two cases remain: a challenge to "fair share" fees paid to unions and an "original" water dispute between Florida and Georgia. After Tuesday's dramatic decisions—with passionate dissents from the bench in the travel ban and California crisis pregnancy center cases—will today bring more drama? Perhaps a retirement? Stay tuned. Meanwhile, our observations from Tuesday's historic sitting are below, and we report on an under-the-radar petition about law firm arbitration clauses. As always, thanks for reading, and we welcome feedback at [email protected] and [email protected]. 
|
Inside the Court for Trump v. Hawaii
John Roberts Jr. Stephen Breyer Sonia Sotomayor the court's landmark decision 
Roberts's words 
Tuesday's
|
Law Firm's Arbitration Push in Malpractice Dispute Fails at High Court
Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson v. Snow. Jenner & Block Matthew Hellman a ruling petition Benjamin Donahue Hallett Whipple Weyrens urged the justices
|
Feuding Foonotes: Alito v. Sotomayor Edition
Samuel Alito Jr. Sonia Sotomayor gerrymander decision
|ICYMI: Kannon Shanmugam's Hat Trick, Trump's Tweets & More
repudiation Clarence Thomas to raise doubts about the lawfulness according here Williams & Connolly Kannon Shanmugam won three cert grants rejected a new chance to argue says will decide turned back a challenge
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Court Overturns $185M Fee Award for Quinn Emanuel in ACA Litigation
The Supreme Court Leaker That Never Was | This Term's 1st Opinion | Attorney-Client Privilege
9 minute read
Who's Arguing at the Lectern | Union-Busted Cement Trucks | Emergency Application Catch Up
9 minute read
Is It Legal Advice or Business Advice? | What Chief Justice John Roberts Didn't Say
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
