Taking a Swing As a SCOTUS Clerk | Online Firearms Ads Challenged | Dreeben Joins Georgetown Faculty | Winston & Strawn's Arbitration Case
Some Supreme Court clerks are "big league" in another respect. Plus: a new petition challenges the Section 230 shield for an online firearms trading site, and Winston & Strawn confronts an ex-partner's "firm always win" claim in a closely watched arbitration case. Thanks for reading!
August 14, 2019 at 07:00 AM
7 minute read
Welcome to Supreme Court Brief. A gun-related challenge testing Section 230 liability under the Communications Decency Act recently landed at the Supreme Court. Meet the Manatt Phelps lawyers on the petition. You could say the justices are heavy hitters in the judicial field–and some of their clerks have their own “big league” experience. We’ll tell you about them. And former Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben finds a temporary home after leaving the Justice Department. Thanks for reading. Contact us at [email protected] and [email protected], and follow us on Twitter at @Tonymauro and @MarciaCoyle.
|
New Petition Confronts Online Firearms Ads
A trio of lawyers from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips is taking the lead in a Supreme Court gun-related petition that challenges a classified advertising website connecting private buyers and sellers of firearms of all kinds.
New York-based counsel Samantha Katze is counsel of record, along with New York partner Jacqueline Wolff and Los Angeles-based associate Molly Wyler, in the case Daniel v. Armslist. The Manatt team is working pro bono with the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
The petition asks the high court to reverse an April decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court that said Armslist could not be held liable for the shooting death of Zina Haughton by her husband. According to the petition, Haughton’s husband was able to obtain a firearm via Armslist despite a restraining order barring him from possessing a firearm for four years.
Brady Center litigation director Jonathan Lowy said the group regularly works with co-counsel “because we have cases all around the country. Some are trial lawyers; some are major firms and usually pro bono.”
Manatt, Lowy said, has been a major supporter of the Brady Center “in all sorts of ways” for many years. “They put a great team together with Jacqueline Wolff and Samantha Katze to work on the case,” he said.
The Manatt-Brady lawyers argue that Armslist can be held liable under an exception to the federal Communications Decency Act, or CDA. That law, which offers a broad shield to online sites that host information posted by third parties, has been called “the most important law protecting Internet speech.”
The state Supreme Court, reversing a lower appellate court decision, said the law’s section 230 “prohibits claims that treat Armslist, an interactive computer service provider, as the publisher or speaker of information posted by a third party on its website.”
In the petition, Manatt claimed state and federal appellate courts have differed on whether the federal law imposes sweeping immunity or more limited immunity to websites like Armslist.
“Regardless whether one feels the CDA should provide sweeping immunity or not, I hope we could all agree there needs to be a definitive interpretation of the CDA and only the U.S. Supreme Court can do that,” Lowy said.
Armslist hasn’t yet filed a response at the high court. The company was represented in the state Supreme Court by a team of lawyers from Milwaukee’s Quarles & Brady, led by partner Joshua Maggard and associate James Goldschmidt. The justices have agreed to hear one gun-related case in the new term thus far—a challenge to New York City’s rules governing transport of firearms outside the city. U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco on Monday asked the court to grant argument time to DOJ.
Armslist is the target of a second Brady lawsuit in state court in Boston. Blank Rome partner John Kimball is counsel to Boston police officer Kurt Stokinger who was shot by a weapon obtained through Armslist. Kimball is working with Boston’s Crowe & Mulvey. —Marcia Coyle
|
Touching Base: From the Diamond to Clerkship
Justice Clarence Thomas’s hire of Williams & Connolly associate Matt Rice as a law clerk for the upcoming term made headlines recently because of an unusual part of his resume: He was once drafted into major league baseball and played a two-year stint in the minor leagues for the Tampa Bay Rays.
But it turns out that Rice is not the first or only law clerk with baseball credentials. Mark Mosier, a Covington & Burling partner who clerked for the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. can also boast that he was a minor league player for the San Francisco Giants from 1997 to 1999.
“It was a great experience, but with a demanding lifestyle and a high stress level,” Mosier recalled in an interview last week. The “do the best you can” attitude he learned amidst adversity in baseball has helped him in his legal career too. When Mosier played in San Jose, the locker next to his belonged to Bobby Bonds Jr., the brother of famed Giant Barry Bonds. Bobby would give Mosier his brother’s used shoes, so Mosier can accurately state that he filled the shoes of Barry Bonds.
After he injured his hand with torn ligaments, Mosier ended his baseball career and took a different path, enrolling in the University of Chicago Law School.
After that, he clerked for then-Tenth Circuit judge Deanell Tacha, who said of Mosier last week, “I knew about Mark’s baseball history, but that was not the reason I hired him! He was a spectacular student with a gold-standard clerk’s resume.”
Rehnquist also talked baseball with Mosier, but the chief justice was ill when Mosier’s clerkship began. It was a sad time at the court, and when Rehnquist died in September 2005, Roberts kept Mosier and other Rehnquist clerks on. Roberts is “a big sports fan too,” Mosier said. —Tony Mauro
|
Supreme Court Headlines: What We’re Reading
• Winston & Strawn Protests Ex-Partner’s ‘Firm Always Wins’ Characterization. Lawyers for Winston & Strawn pressed their argument at the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday that a former partner should be forced to make her discrimination and retaliation claims through a confidential arbitration proceeding and not in court. Orrick’s E. Joshua Rosenkranz, above, is counsel of record to Winston & Strawn.[NLJ]
• Michael Dreeben, Longtime SCOTUS Advocate, Joins Georgetown Law Faculty. Michael Dreeben, a former longtime U.S. deputy solicitor general who is widely considered a leading authority on criminal law, will join Georgetown University Law Center in Washington as a distinguished lecturer in government for the 2019-20 academic year. [NLJ]
• Texas and Louisiana Tout Pro-Trump Emoluments Ruling to Defend Abortion Restrictions. Fifth Circuit Judge Andrew Oldham, a former Alito clerk, dominated questioning of Debevoise & Plimpton’s Shannon Selden, who urged the appeals court not to create a fast track for merits review from the denial of a motion to dismiss. [NLJ]
• She Recorded Her Rapist’s Confession. Now, the Supreme Court Could Hear It. “The Justice Department has asked the Supreme Court to review and reverse what it describes firmly as a ‘misunderstanding of the law.’ Allowing it to stand would ‘subvert the military’s concerted effort to eradicate sexual assault, erode confidence in the military-justice system, and fuel the impression that ‘nothing will happen to the perpetrator.’” [CNN]
• Justice Department Urges Civil Rights Agents to Flip LGBT Stance. “The commission’s blessing isn’t necessary, but having the EEOC’s general counsel named on the brief would allow the Trump administration to present a unified front in a contentious, potentially landmark case.” [Bloomberg Law]
• Appellate Pro Steffen Johnson Leaves Winston & Strawn. Steffen Johnson, a 14-year veteran of Winston & Strawn, has reportedly left the firm for Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. [NLJ] Bloomberg Law has more here.
• DOJ’s Noel Francisco Wants to Argue in Disputed Gun Case the Justices Might Not Hear. But the government hasn’t taken a position on whether the case is now moot as a product of New York giving the challengers what they wanted. [NLJ]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250