Good morning and welcome to Supreme Court Brief! The justices’ “long conference” is just a week away—Sept. 28—and marks the unofficial end of summer for court watchers. Constitution Day was just four days ago and to celebrate that occasion, the National Constitution Center revealed the results of its virtual constitutional convention during which three ideologically different teams of law professors met and proposed amendments. We have the details of their surprising consensus. We also take a look at a petition involving the recusal standard for judges. And scroll down for a Mississippi judge’s “blistering” dissent in a voting rights case that could trigger SCOTUS’ interest.
Thanks for reading. We welcome feedback and tips. Contact Marcia Coyle at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @MarciaCoyle.
(Photo: Shutterstock.com)
Amending the Constitution
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
