Good morning and welcome to Supreme Court Brief! Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson broke the freshman's "first opinion" ice on Monday with a dissent from a denial of review in a capital case. It was not her first official opinion for the court, which, while eagerly anticipated, will undoubtedly be dissected closely by many court watchers. Also dissenting on Monday, Justices Gorsuch and Thomas revisited doctrines that they would like to confine to the dustbin of history. We have more below on those dissents. Also, we have the details on a new public, searchable database of judicial financial disclosure reports and stock transactions, thanks to a new law. And scroll down to read how recent protests in the courtroom could set back those who want cameras in the high court.

Thanks for reading. We welcome feedback and tips. Contact Marcia Coyle at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @MarciaCoyle. 

Justices Clarence Thomas, left, and Neil Gorsuch, right,. Photos: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM

'Tombstones' for Chevron & Feres

Justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas have made it very clear in opinions and separate writings that they are no fans of two doctrines in particular. Gorsuch is ready to inter Chevron deference to agencies' reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes. And Thomas is ready for the court to end the "chaos" it created with its 1950 decision in Feres v. United States, which held that military personnel cannot sue the United States for any injury "incident to military service," even if the Federal Tort Claims Act would otherwise allow the suit.

The two justices on Monday used their dissents from denials of review in separate cases to  urge their colleagues to tackle the injustices caused by those two decisions.