Good morning and welcome to Supreme Court Brief! This morning, the justices hear arguments in one of its most significant election law cases, Moore v. Harper. We show how Bush v. Gore has played a role in the theory behind the challenge to the North Carolina redistricting case. The justices appear to be “slow out of the gate” with decisions this term. Empirical scholar Adam Feldman offers some data as well as who are the fastest and slowest writers on the court. Plus, scroll down for criticism of some of the justices in Monday’s First Amendment arguments.
Thanks for reading. We welcome feedback and tips. Contact Marcia Coyle at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @MarciaCoyle.
Bush and Gore masks at The Caucus Room restaurant and bar on election night in 2000. Photo: Patrice Gilbert/ALM
‘A Legal Voldemort’
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
