What to Watch in 2023 | 'In Bonk,' 'On Bonk,' 'En Bank,' What? | Bye, Bye, Taney
With the year rapidly drawing to a close, we focus on 2023 and what to expect in terms of arguments, decisions and other court-related issues.
December 20, 2022 at 02:41 PM
9 minute read
Good morning and welcome to Supreme Court Brief! With the year rapidly drawing to a close, we focus on 2023 and what to expect in terms of arguments, decisions and other court-related issues. We also preview a fun essay appearing in 2023 about the origins of the phrase "en banc" and how to pronounce it. Plus, scroll down for Congress' disposal of another Roger Taney statute.
This is the final Supreme Court Brief of 2022 and the final one by this reporter. I am retiring from The National Law Journal but not from covering the Supreme Court. I will continue to provide analysis for PBS NewsHour and perhaps occasionally for the National Law Journal. You can reach me at: [email protected]. It has been an honor to write for you and to get to know so many of you. Best wishes for a healthy and safe 2023!
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM What Will 2023 Bring?
By now it's pretty obvious that the justices are saving their "fire power" (decisions) for the new year. As Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS told us earlier, it has been a very long time since the court has gone as long as it has without issuing a ruling in the first half of the term. That's not to say the justices haven't been busy. Since the start of the current term, they've disposed of more than 20 emergency applications, many of them requests for stays of executions.
And so with eyes on 2023, here are some cases and other items to watch for:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Supreme Indifference? Justices Unfazed By TikTok’s Time Crunch
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
