Happy Tuesday and welcome to the Supreme Court Brief! Legal Tech News Reporter Cassandre Coyer helped us out this week on this ‘curtain raiser’ for this week’s oral arguments involving the future of Section 230. The dispute stems from claims that social media platforms have allowed terrorism to spread without consequence and the results could have a big impact beyond just the tech world. Then, after the high court removed a dispute over immigration policy – and state intervention – from the calendar without explanation, we spoke to scholars who have some theories as to why. And finally we’ve got a rundown on who you’ll see (or hear) behind the podium for challenges in hearings next week.
As always, thanks for reading and we welcome feedback and tips. Contact Avalon Zoppo at[email protected] and follow her on Twitter @AvalonZoppo. You can find Brad Kutner at [email protected] and @bradkutner.
Section 230 Cases Could Reverberate Beyond Big Tech
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
