Supreme Court Brief: Justices Begin Their Look at Section 230 | Plus: No New Cert Grants
After hours of oral argument, the future of YouTube and other platforms' liability for content management before the U.S. Supreme Court was no more clear Tuesday than when the dispute was first filed.
February 22, 2023 at 06:30 AM
6 minute read
Happy Wednesday! Welcome to the Supreme Court Brief. The high court released an orders list Tuesday morning. We've got a run down on what (didn't) make the cut as no cases were granted cert. We've also got our coverage of yesterday's oral arguments in Gonzalez v. Google, one of two headline-grabbing Section 230 disputes. The court appeared uneasy with any drastic steps, according to the experts we spoke with.
As always, thanks for reading and we welcome feedback and tips. You may contact Avalon Zoppo at [email protected]and follow her on Twitter @AvalonZoppo. You can find Brad Kutner at [email protected] and @bradkutner.
Justice Clarence Thomas. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALMExperts See Limited or No Action on Section 230
After hours of oral argument, the future of YouTube and other platforms' liability for content management before the U.S. Supreme Court was no more clear Tuesday than when the dispute was first filed.
The case, Gonzalez v. Google, one of two cases focused on how private companies are protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to be heard this week, was supposed to focus on when and how a platform like YouTube is responsible for what it shows a user. But as the debate expanded, going back to the law's enactment in 1996, court watchers saw a more limited outcome as the implications of the court broadly changing the law became more clear.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
