Supreme Court Brief: Religious Employees | Fair Claims Act 'Pendulum' Case | On the NJ-NY Waterfront
The justices took more than two hours hearing a debate over a religious person's right to be accommodated in their work schedule.
April 19, 2023 at 06:45 AM
5 minute read
Good morning and happy Wednesday! We've got a double dose of Supreme Court oral argument coverage after Tuesday's lineup of blockbuster hearings. Avalon tuned in for the nearly two-hour debate over a religious person's right to be accommodated in their work schedule while Brad spoke with federal contract attorneys about the future of False Claims Act litigation in the shadow of United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu. And finally, Emily Saul of the New York Law Journal stepped in to cover an opinion out of the high court from Tuesday which impacts the fraught relationship between New York and New Jersey in waterfront management.
As always, thanks for reading and we welcome feedback and tips. You may contact Avalon Zoppo at [email protected] follow her on Twitter @AvalonZoppo. You can find Brad Kutner at [email protected] and @bradkutner.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM Justices Probe Workplace Religious Accommodation Test
U.S. Supreme Court justices grappled Tuesday with when employers may refuse employees' workplace religious accommodation requests in a case concerning an Evangelical Christian mail carrier who didn't want to deliver packages on Sundays.
At issue is the high court's nearly 50-year-old precedential Trans World Airlines v. Hardison decision which states that employers don't need to provide religious accommodations to employees if it would create an "undue hardship." Under the ruling, "undue hardship" means an accommodation would impose more than a minimal burden on the workplace.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
- 2Keys to Maximizing Efficiency (and Vibes) When Navigating International Trade Compliance Crosschecks
- 3Houston Law Firm Files $250K Breach of Contract Suit Against 2 Former Lawyers
- 4The Week in Data Feb. 3: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 5Mass Tort Cases: Challenges for Plaintiff’s and Defense Counsel
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
