Facing the 'Behemoth': Justices Finally Get Their Shot at Chevron Deference
Supreme Court will consider whether judges should continue to defer to federal agencies.
January 16, 2024 at 06:45 AM
5 minute read
Welcome to Supreme Court Brief. The nine justices return to the bench Tuesday for their final two days of arguments before the Feb. 8 showdown over former President Donald Trump's eligibility for office.
The court will hear four cases on Tuesday and Wednesday, including perhaps the most highly anticipated administrative law case of the 21st Century. The hearing, as discussed more below, will center on the validity of one of the Supreme Court's most frequently cited precedents — the 1984 decision Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council — the toppling of which would send shockwaves across the federal government.
But first, the court announced what could be their final "cert grants," or new cases, of the October 2023 term in an orders list released Friday afternoon. One of those is an appeal from Starbucks over a court order to reinstate "The Memphis Seven," seven fired workers at a Tennessee Starbucks location who were in a union organizing campaign and whom the company said violated various store policies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’ In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/supremecourtbrief/contrib/content/uploads/sites/400/2023/10/Brett-Kavanaugh-2019-01-767x633.jpg)
In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Will Big Law's Bet on the Middle East Pay Off?
- 2Jury Awards $3M in Shooting at Nightclub
- 3How Clean Is the Clean Slate Act?
- 4Florida Bar Sues Miami Attorney for Frivolous Lawsuits
- 5Donald Trump Serves Only De Facto and Not De Jure: A Status That Voids His Acts Usurping the Power of Congress or the Courts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250