The clock had just struck 1:15 p.m. on Wednesday when the justices, who had been in the courtroom since 10 a.m., finally appeared at a loss of what else to ask U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar about “Chevron deference.”
After more than three hours of rapid-fire questioning, over the course of two separate hearings, it seemed like all that could be said had been said about whether to overturn the “foundational” doctrine of administrative law, as Prelogar had called it.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
