Houston lawyer Stanley Schneider won partial victory in a controversial U.S. Supreme Court case on Wednesday in an unusual way: without any amicus curiae briefs filed on his side, and with almost no help from veteran high court advocates.
Fierce modern-day competition among top-tier law firms for Supreme Court work almost guarantees that once a case is granted review, offers of help from D.C. lawyers will flood in, along with friend-of-the-court briefs from interested parties.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
