Lawyers for the Obama administration and an Illinois mining company clashed sharply before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday over whether federal courts should review employer claims that the federal officials failed to conciliate job bias charges as required by law.

At the end of spirited arguments in Mach Mining v. EEOC, which some employment lawyers view as one of the most important cases on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission litigation in years, the justices seemed to lean towards some judicial review, but were struggling with how much.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]